Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing

被引:121
作者
Maurer, D. [1 ]
O'Craven, K. M.
Le Grand, R.
Mondloch, C. J.
Springer, M. V.
Lewis, T. L.
Grady, C. L.
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychol Neurosci & Behav, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Rotman Res Inst Baycrest, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Kwantlen Univ Coll, Surrey, BC, Canada
[4] Brock Univ, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
fMRI; FFA; face processing; features; spacing; frontal cortex; configural;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.016
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Adults' expertise in recognizing facial identity involves encoding subtle differences among faces in the shape of individual facial features (featural processing) and in the spacing among features (a type of configural processing called sensitivity to second-order relations). We used fMRI to investigate the neural mechanisms that differentiate these two types of processing. Participants made same/different judgments about pairs of faces that differed only in the shape of the eyes and mouth, with minimal differences in spacing (featural blocks), or pairs of faces that had identical features but differed in the positions of those features (spacing blocks). From a localizer scan with faces, objects, and houses, we identified regions with comparatively more activity for faces, including the fusiform face area (FFA) in the right fusiform gyrus, other extrastriate regions, and prefrontal cortices. Contrasts between the featural and spacing conditions revealed distributed patterns of activity differentiating the two conditions. A region of the right fusiform gyrus (near but not overlapping the localized FFA) showed greater activity during the spacing task, along with multiple areas of right frontal cortex, whereas left prefrontal activity increased for featural processing. These patterns of activity were not related to differences in performance between the two tasks. The results indicate that the processing of facial features is distinct from the processing of second-order relations in faces, and that these functions are mediated by separate and lateralized networks involving the right fusiform gyrus, although the FFA as defined from a localizer scan is not differentially involved. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1438 / 1451
页数:14
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   Neural systems for recognizing emotion [J].
Adolphs, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :169-177
[2]   Neural components of topographical representation [J].
Aguirre, GK ;
Zarahn, E ;
D'Esposito, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (03) :839-846
[3]   Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas [J].
Aguirre, GK ;
Singh, R ;
D'Esposito, M .
NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (01) :189-194
[4]  
Anderson AK, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P5627
[5]   Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion [J].
Andrews, TJ ;
Schluppeck, D ;
Homfray, D ;
Matthews, P ;
Blakemore, C .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (02) :890-901
[6]   Detailed exploration of face-related processing in congenital prosopagnosia: 2. Functional neuroimaging findings [J].
Avidan, G ;
Hasson, U ;
Malach, R ;
Behrmann, M .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 17 (07) :1150-1167
[7]   Lesions of the fusiform, face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia [J].
Barton, JJS ;
Press, DZ ;
Keenan, JP ;
O'Connor, M .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (01) :71-78
[8]   A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory [J].
Braver, TS ;
Cohen, JD ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Jonides, J ;
Smith, EE ;
Noll, DC .
NEUROIMAGE, 1997, 5 (01) :49-62
[9]   Face recognition and postero-inferior hemispheric lesions [J].
Clarke, S ;
Lindemann, A ;
Maeder, P ;
Borruat, FX ;
Assal, G .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1997, 35 (12) :1555-1563
[10]   Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity [J].
Collishaw, SM ;
Hole, GJ .
PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 (08) :893-909