Comparison of the DORT2002 radiative transfer solution method and the Kubelka-Munk model

The need for optical modeling of paper is obvious to provide connections between its optical response and the actual properties of the paper. It is argued that modern solution methods from radiative transfer theory could be considered instead of the Kubelka-Munk model, and a specific example, DORT2002, is tested. It is shown that Kubelka-Munk is a simple special case of DORT2002, and the two models and their coefficients are compared. A comprehensive list of advantages for the applied user of a model with higher dimensionality is supplied. It is shown, by the use of DORT2002, that when the medium has finite thickness, the light distribution deviates from the perfectly diffuse even under the theoretically ideal conditions for which Kubelka-Munk was created. This effect causes errors in Kubelka-Munk reflectance calculations that may be up to 20% and more, even for a grammage of 80 g/mZ. The magnitude of the error shows a strong dependence on the degree of light absorption, with higher absorption giving greater error. DORT2002 can well be considered for increased understanding in cases where the level of accuracy of Kubelka-Munk reflectance calculations is not sufficient.