Multi-period portfolio optimization using coherent fuzzy numbers in a credibilistic environment

被引:37
作者
Gupta, Pankaj [1 ]
Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar [1 ]
Khan, Ahmad Zaman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delhi, Dept Operat Res, Delhi 110007, India
关键词
Fuzzy multi-period portfolio optimization; Multi-objective programming; Fuzzy set theory; Coherent fuzzy numbers; Conditional Value-at-Risk; Real-coded genetic algorithm; MODEL; SELECTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114135
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we use an extension of fuzzy numbers, called coherent fuzzy numbers, to model asset returns and an investor's perception of the stock market (pessimistic, optimistic, or neutral) simultaneously. Two multi-period multi-objective portfolio optimization models are formulated using mean absolute semi-deviation and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) as risk measures, respectively. We aim to provide more flexibility to the investor in specifying the risk tolerance and devise optimum investment plans for different investment horizons. The proposed models also incorporate bound, cardinality, and skewness constraints for each investment period to capture various stock market scenarios. A real-coded genetic algorithm is employed to solve the resultant models. Two real-life case studies involving 20 assets of the National Stock Exchange (NSE), India, and another involving 50 assets listed in the S&P 500 and NASDAQ-100 indexes have been provided to illustrate the efficacy and advantages of the models. An in-sample and out-of-sample analysis have been done for both the models to analyze the performance in the real-world scenario. The conclusion drawn from the analysis strongly emphasizes on accurately assessing the current stock market prospects, i.e., adopting the right attitude (pessimistic, optimistic, or neutral), is of paramount importance and must be included in the portfolio optimization problem.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   A novel multi period mean-VaR portfolio optimization model considering practical constraints and transaction cost [J].
Babazadeh, Hossein ;
Esfahanipour, Akbar .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2019, 361 :313-342
[2]   A multi-objective genetic algorithm for cardinality constrained fuzzy portfolio selection [J].
Bermudez, J. D. ;
Segura, J. V. ;
Vercher, E. .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2012, 188 (01) :16-26
[3]   A Hybrid Multiobjective Bat Algorithm for Fuzzy Portfolio Optimization with Real-World Constraints [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Xu, Wen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 21 (01) :291-307
[4]   Artificial bee colony algorithm for constrained possibilistic portfolio optimization problem [J].
Chen, Wei .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2015, 429 :125-139
[5]  
Deb K., 1995, Complex Systems, V9, P431
[6]  
Deb K., 1995, Complex Systems, V9, P115
[7]   Asset portfolio optimization using fuzzy mathematical programming [J].
Gupta, Pankaj ;
Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar ;
Saxena, Anand .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2008, 178 (06) :1734-1755
[8]   A Credibilistic Fuzzy DEA Approach for Portfolio Efficiency Evaluation and Rebalancing Toward Benchmark Portfolios Using Positive and Negative Returns [J].
Gupta, Pankaj ;
Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar ;
Kumar, Arun ;
Yadav, Sanjay ;
Aggarwal, Abha .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 22 (03) :824-843
[9]   A multicriteria optimization model of portfolio rebalancing with transaction costs in fuzzy environment [J].
Gupta, Pankaj ;
Mittal, Garima ;
Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar .
MEMETIC COMPUTING, 2014, 6 (01) :61-74
[10]   Multiobjective expected value model for portfolio selection in fuzzy environment [J].
Gupta, Pankaj ;
Mittal, Garima ;
Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar .
OPTIMIZATION LETTERS, 2013, 7 (08) :1765-1791