Radiation Dose from Diagnostic Computed Tomography in Saskatchewan

被引:5
作者
Leswick, David A. [1 ]
Syed, Nida S. [2 ]
Dumaine, Chance S.
Lim, Hyun J. [3 ]
Fladeland, Derek A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Royal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Med, Dept Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
来源
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES | 2009年 / 60卷 / 02期
关键词
Computed tomography; CT; Tomography; spiral computed; Tomography scanners; X-ray computed; Radiation dose; Radiation dosage; Radiation; Physics; CT; EXPOSURE; MULTISLICE; HOSPITALS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.carj.2009.02.035
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To calculate the effective dose from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans in Saskatchewan, Canada, and compare with other reported dose levels. Methods: Data from CT scans were collected from 12 scanners in 7 cities across Saskatchewan. The patient age, scan type, and selected technique parameters including the dose length product and the volume computed tomography dose index were collected for a 2-week period. This information then was used to calculate effective doses patients are exposed to during CT examinations. Data from 2,061 clinically indicated CT examinations were collected, and of them 1,690 were eligible for analysis. Every examination during a 2-week period was recorded without selection. Results: The average provincial estimated patient dose was as follows: head, 2.7 mSv (638 scans; standard deviation [SD], +/- 1.6); chest, 11.3 mSv (376 scans; SD, +/- 8.9); abdomen-pelvis, 15.5 mSv (578 scans; SD, +/- 10.0); abdomen, 11.7 mSv (80 scans; SD, +/- 11.48), and pelvis, 8.6 mSv (18 scans; SD, +/- 6.04). Significant variation in dose between the CT scanners was observed (P = .049 for head, P = .001 for chest, and P = .034 for abdomen-pelvis). Conclusions: Overall, the estimated dose from diagnostic CT examinations was similar to other previously published Canadian data from British Columbia. This dose varied slightly from some other published standards, including being higher than those found in a review conducted in the United Kingdom in 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Aldrich JE, 2005, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V56, P94
[2]  
ALDRICH JE, 1997, ACRP9 AT EN CONTR BO
[3]  
Aldrich JE, 2006, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V57, P152
[4]  
Aldrich JE, 2006, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V57, P79
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 16262 EUR EN EUR COM
[6]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[7]   Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey [J].
Brix, G ;
Nagel, HD ;
Stamm, G ;
Veit, R ;
Lechel, U ;
Griebel, J ;
Galanski, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (08) :1979-1991
[8]  
COURSEY CA, 2008, APPL RADIOL, V13, P22
[9]   Price of isotropy in multidetector CT [J].
Dalrymple, Neal C. ;
Prasad, Srinivasa R. ;
El-Merhi, Fadi M. ;
Chintapalli, Kedar N. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (01) :49-U4
[10]  
*EUR COMM, 1999, RAD PROT, V109