Granger Causality on forward and Reversed Time Series

被引:7
|
作者
Chvostekova, Martina [1 ]
Jakubik, Jozef [1 ]
Krakovska, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Measurement Sci, Bratislava 84104, Slovakia
关键词
time reversal; Granger causality; predictive error; endogeneity;
D O I
10.3390/e23040409
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In this study, the information flow time arrow is investigated for stochastic data defined by vector autoregressive models. The time series are analyzed forward and backward by different Granger causality detection methods. Besides the normal distribution, which is usually required for the validity of Granger causality analysis, several other distributions of predictive errors are considered. A clear effect of a change in the order of cause and effect on the time-reversed series of unidirectionally connected variables was detected with standard Granger causality test (GC), when the product of the connection strength and the ratio of the predictive errors of the driver and the recipient was below a certain level, otherwise bidirectional causal connection was detected. On the other hand, opposite causal link was detected unconditionally by the methods based on the time reversal testing, but they were not able to detect correct bidirectional connection. The usefulness of the backward analysis is manifested in cases where falsely detected unidirectional connections can be rejected by applying the result obtained after the time reversal, and in cases of uncorrelated causally independent variables, where the absence of a causal link detected by GC on the original series should be confirmed on the time-reversed series.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Testing for time-varying Granger causality
    Baum, Christopher F.
    Hurn, Stan
    Otero, Jesus
    STATA JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (02) : 355 - 378
  • [32] Multiple Granger causality tests for network structure estimation from time-series data
    Harima, Hikaru
    Oba, Shigeyuki
    Ishii, Shin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ARTIFICIAL LIFE AND ROBOTICS (AROB 16TH '11), 2011, : 858 - 861
  • [33] Exploring Granger causality between global average observed time series of carbon dioxide and temperature
    Evan Kodra
    Snigdhansu Chatterjee
    Auroop R. Ganguly
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2011, 104 : 325 - 335
  • [34] Detecting changes in coupling with Granger causality method from time series with fast transient processes
    Sysoev, Ilya V.
    Sysoeva, Marina V.
    PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, 2015, 309 : 9 - 19
  • [35] Gene Network Inference Using Forward Backward Pairwise Granger Causality
    Furcian, Mohammad Shaheryar
    Siyal, Mohammad Yakoob
    2015 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, MODELLING AND SIMULATION (AIMS 2015), 2015, : 321 - 324
  • [36] Nonlinear Granger Causality using ANFIS for Identification of Causal Couplings among EEG/MEG Time Series
    Farokhzadi, Mona
    Soltanian-Zadeh, Hamid
    Hossein-Zadeh, Gholam-Ali
    2016 23RD IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND 2016 1ST INTERNATIONAL IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ICBME), 2016, : 64 - 68
  • [37] Dimension Reduction of Polynomial Regression Models for the Estimation of Granger Causality in High-Dimensional Time Series
    Siggiridou, Elsa
    Kugiumtzis, Dimitris
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 69 : 5638 - 5650
  • [38] Granger causality revisited
    Friston, Karl J.
    Bastos, Andre M.
    Oswal, Ashwini
    van Wijk, Bernadette
    Richter, Craig
    Litvak, Vladimir
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 101 : 796 - 808
  • [39] Neural Granger Causality
    Tank, Alex
    Covert, Ian
    Foti, Nicholas
    Shojaie, Ali
    Fox, Emily B.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 44 (08) : 4267 - 4279
  • [40] On spurious Granger causality
    He, ZL
    Maekawa, K
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2001, 73 (03) : 307 - 313