Validation of breast cancer nomograms for predicting the non-sentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a multi-center study

被引:69
作者
Gur, A. S. [3 ]
Unal, B. [4 ]
Ozbek, U. [5 ]
Ozmen, V. [6 ]
Aydogan, F. [7 ]
Gokgoz, S. [8 ]
Gulluoglu, B. M. [9 ]
Aksaz, E. [10 ,11 ]
Ozbas, S. [12 ]
Baskan, S. [13 ]
Koyuncu, A. [2 ]
Soran, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] UPMC, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sivas, Turkey
[3] Ataturk Teaching & Res Hosp, Izmir, Turkey
[4] Inonu Univ, Malatya, Turkey
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[6] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[7] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Med Fac, Istanbul, Turkey
[8] Uludag Univ, Bursa, Turkey
[9] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[10] Oncol State Hosp, Bursa, Turkey
[11] Mamer Surg Clin, Bursa, Turkey
[12] Adnan Menderes Univ, Fac Med, Aydin, Turkey
[13] Ankara Univ, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
来源
EJSO | 2010年 / 36卷 / 01期
关键词
Breast cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Non-sentinel lymph node; Nomogram; LIKELIHOOD; INVOLVEMENT; CARCINOMA; DISSECTION; LIMITATIONS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2009.05.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: In the study, our aim was to evaluate the predictability of four different nomograms on non-sentinel lymph node metastases (NSLNM) in breast cancer (BC) patients with positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in a multi-center study. Methods: We identified 607 patients who had a positive SLN biopsy and completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) at seven different BC treatment centers in Turkey. The BC nomograms developed by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), Tenon Hospital, Cambridge University, and Stanford University were used to calculate the probability of NSLNM. Area under (AUC) Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (ROC) was calculated for each nomogram and values greater than 0.70 were accepted as demonstrating good discrimination. Results: Two hundred and eighty-seven patients (287) of 607 patients (47.2%) had a positive axillary NSLNM. The AUC values were 0.705, 0.711, 0.730, and 0.582 for the MSKCC, Cambridge, Stanford, and Tenon models, respectively. On the multivariate analysis; overall metastasis size (OMS), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and proportion of positive SLN to total SLN were found statistically significant. We created a formula to predict the NSLNM in our patient population and the AUC value of this formula was 0.8023. Conclusions: The MSKCC, Cambridge, and Stanford nomograms were good discriminators of NSLNM in SLN positive BC patients in this study. A newly created formula in this Study needs to be validated in prospective studies in different patient populations. A nomogram to predict NSLNM in patients with positive SLN biopsy developed at one institution should be used with caution. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 35
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Predictors of positive axillary lymph nodes after sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer [J].
Abdessalam, SF ;
Zervos, EE ;
Prasad, M ;
Farrar, WB ;
Yee, LD ;
Walker, MJ ;
Carson, WB ;
Burak, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 182 (04) :316-320
[2]   Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy [J].
Alran, Severine ;
De Rycke, Yann ;
Fourchotte, Virginie ;
Charitansky, Helene ;
Laki, Fatima ;
Falcou, Marie Christine ;
Benamor, Myriam ;
Frencaux, Paul ;
Salmon, Remy Jacques ;
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (08) :2195-2201
[3]   An axilla scoring system to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement [J].
Barranger, E ;
Coutant, C ;
Flahault, A ;
Delpech, Y ;
Darai, E ;
Uzan, S .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 91 (02) :113-119
[4]   Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection? [J].
Chu, KU ;
Turner, RR ;
Hansen, NM ;
Brennan, MB ;
Bilchik, A ;
Giuliano, AE .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 229 (04) :536-541
[5]   Evaluation of three scoring systems predicting non sentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy [J].
Dauphine, Christine E. ;
Haukoos, Jason S. ;
Vargas, Maria P. ;
Isaac, Nova M. ;
Khalkhali, Iraj ;
Vargas, Hernan I. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (03) :1014-1019
[6]   Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram [J].
Degnim, AC ;
Reynolds, C ;
Pantvaidya, G ;
Zakaria, S ;
Hoskin, T ;
Barnes, S ;
Roberts, MV ;
Lucas, PC ;
Oh, K ;
Koker, M ;
Sabel, MS ;
Newman, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (04) :543-550
[7]   The predicted probability of having positive non-sentinel lymph nodes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for large operable breast cancer [J].
Evrensel, T. ;
Johnson, R. ;
Ahrendt, G. ;
Bonaventura, M. ;
Falk, J. S. ;
Keenan, D. ;
Soran, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 62 (09) :1379-1382
[8]   Predictive Probability of Four Different Breast Cancer Nomograms for Nonsentinel Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy [J].
Gur, Akif S. ;
Unal, Bulent ;
Johnson, Ronald ;
Ahrendt, Gretchen ;
Bonaventura, Marguerite ;
Gordon, Patricia ;
Soran, Atilla .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (02) :229-235
[9]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[10]   Predictors to Assess Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis [J].
Jinno, Hiromitsu ;
Sakata, Michio ;
Asaga, Sota ;
Wada, Masahiro ;
Shimada, Toshiyuki ;
Kitagawa, Yuko ;
Suzuki, Takayuki ;
Nakahara, Tadaki ;
Kitamura, Naoto ;
Kubo, Atsushi ;
Mukai, Makio ;
Ikeda, Tadashi ;
Kitajima, Masaki .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (06) :551-555