Utility of DWI with quantitative ADC values in ovarian tumors: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance

被引:22
作者
Pi, Shan [1 ]
Cao, Rong [1 ]
Qiang, Jin Wei [1 ]
Guo, Yan Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Jinshan Hosp, Dept Radiol, 1508 Longhang Rd, Shanghai 201508, Peoples R China
关键词
Diffusion-weighted imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; ovarian tumors; diagnosis; meta-analysis; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; DIFFERENTIATING BORDERLINE; EPITHELIAL TUMORS; SOLID COMPONENTS; MASSES; BENIGN; CARCINOMA; MRI;
D O I
10.1177/0284185118759708
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values are widely used in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative ADC values in ovarian tumors. Material and Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and local databases were searched for studies assessing ovarian tumors using quantitative ADC values. We quantitatively analyzed the diagnostic performances for two clinical problems: benign vs. malignant tumors and borderline vs. malignant tumors. We evaluated diagnostic performances by the pooled sensitivity and specificity values and by summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. Subgroup analyses were used to analyze study heterogeneity. Results: From the 742 studies identified in the search results, 16 studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of ten studies evaluated malignant vs. benign ovarian tumors and six studies assessed malignant vs. borderline ovarian tumors. Regarding the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative ADC values for distinguishing between malignant and benign ovarian tumors, the pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.91 and 0.91, respectively. The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.96. For differentiating borderline from malignant tumors, the pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.89 and 0.79, and the AUC was 0.91. The methodological quality of the included studies was moderate. Conclusion: Quantitative ADC values could serve as useful preoperative markers for predicting the nature of ovarian tumors. Nevertheless, prospective trials focused on standardized imaging parameters are needed to evaluate the clinical value of quantitative ADC values in ovarian tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:1386 / 1394
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations [J].
不详 .
NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02) :102-125
[2]  
[Anonymous], J CHINA CLIN MED IMA
[3]   Multiparametric MRI for differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors from stage I malignant epithelial ovarian tumors using multivariate logistic regression analysis [J].
Denewar, Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah ;
Takeuchi, Mitsuru ;
Urano, Misugi ;
Kamishima, Yuki ;
Kawai, Tatsuya ;
Takahashi, Naoki ;
Takeuchi, Moe ;
Kobayashi, Susumu ;
Honda, Junichi ;
Shibamoto, Yuta .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 91 :116-123
[4]  
Fan XH, 2015, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V8, P19928
[5]  
[方如旗 Fang Ruqi], 2014, [临床放射学杂志, Journal of Clinical Radiology], V33, P1705
[6]   Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 [J].
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle ;
Dikshit, Rajesh ;
Eser, Sultan ;
Mathers, Colin ;
Rebelo, Marise ;
Parkin, Donald Maxwell ;
Forman, David ;
Bray, Freddie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (05) :E359-E386
[7]   Clinical management potential tumours of low malignancy [J].
Gershenson, DM .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) :513-+
[8]  
He YY, 2017, CHIN J CT MRI, V15, P103
[9]   In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging [J].
Issa, B .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :196-200
[10]   Diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging of ovarian tumors: Is it useful to measure apparent diffusion coefficients? [J].
Katayama, M ;
Masui, T ;
Kobayashi, S ;
Ito, T ;
Sakahara, H ;
Nozaki, A ;
Kabasawa, H .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2002, 26 (02) :250-256