Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

被引:26
作者
Tierney, William M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alpert, Sheri A. [3 ]
Byrket, Amy [1 ]
Caine, Kelly [3 ,4 ]
Leventhal, Jeremy C. [1 ]
Meslin, Eric M. [3 ]
Schwartz, Peter H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Eskenazi Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Clemson Univ Sch Comp, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
fair information practices; electronic health records; patient preferences; quality of care; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL GOPHER; SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; NETWORK; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-014-3053-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Applying Fair Information Practice principles to electronic health records (EHRs) requires allowing patient control over who views their data. METHODS: We designed a program that captures patients' preferences for provider access to an urban health system's EHR. Patients could allow or restrict providers' access to all data (diagnoses, medications, test results, reports, etc.) or only highly sensitive data (sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, drugs/alcohol, mental or reproductive health). Except for information in free-text reports, we redacted EHR data shown to providers according to patients' preferences. Providers could "break the glass" to display redacted information. We prospectively studied this system in one primary care clinic, noting redactions and when users "broke the glass," and surveyed providers about their experiences and opinions. RESULTS: Eight of nine eligible clinic physicians and all 23 clinic staff participated. All 105 patients who enrolled completed the preference program. Providers did not know which of their patients were enrolled, nor their preferences for accessing their EHRs. During the 6-month prospective study, 92 study patients (88 %) returned 261 times, during which providers viewed their EHRs 126 times (48 %). Providers " broke the glass" 102 times, 92 times for patients not in the study and ten times for six returning study patients, all of whom had restricted EHR access. Providers " broke the glass" for six (14 %) of 43 returning study patients with redacted data vs. zero among 49 study patients without redactions (p=0.01). Although 54 % of providers agreed that patients should have control over who sees their EHR information, 58 % believed restricting EHR access could harm provider-patient relationships and 71 % felt quality of care would suffer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients frequently preferred restricting provider access to their EHRs. Providers infrequently overrode patients' preferences to view hidden data. Providers believed that restricting EHR access would adversely impact patient care. Applying Fair Information Practice principles to EHRs will require balancing patient preferences, providers' needs, and health care quality.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] National estimates of the impact of electronic health records on the workload of primary care physicians
    Jaeyong Bae
    William E. Encinosa
    BMC Health Services Research, 16
  • [42] The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Workflow and Financial Measures in Primary Care Practices
    Fleming, Neil S.
    Becker, Edmund R.
    Culler, Steven D.
    Cheng, Dunlei
    McCorkle, Russell
    da Graca, Briget
    Ballard, David J.
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 49 (01) : 405 - 420
  • [43] National estimates of the impact of electronic health records on the workload of primary care physicians
    Bae, Jaeyong
    Encinosa, William E.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16
  • [44] The Impact of Patient Access to Electronic Health Records onHealth Care Engagement: Systematic Review
    Alomar, Dalia
    Almashmoum, Maryam
    Eleftheriou, Iliada
    Whelan, Pauline
    Ainsworth, John
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [45] Mobile Access System for the Management of Electronic Health Records of Patients with Mental Disability
    Anton-Rodriguez, M.
    de la Torre-Diez, I.
    Gutierrez-Diez, P.
    Diaz-Pernas, F. J.
    Martinez-Zarzuela, M.
    Gonzalez-Ortega, D.
    Diez-Higuera, J. F.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 91 : 329 - 336
  • [46] Estimating the population health burden of musculoskeletal conditions using primary care electronic health records
    Yu, Dahai
    Peat, George
    Jordan, Kelvin P.
    Bailey, James
    Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
    Robinson, Danielle E.
    Strauss, Victoria Y.
    Walker-Bone, Karen
    Silman, Alan
    Mamas, Mamas
    Blackburn, Steven
    Dent, Stephen
    Dunn, Kate
    Judge, Andrew
    Protheroe, Joanne
    Wilkie, Ross
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 60 (10) : 4832 - 4843
  • [47] Identifying Dynamic Patterns of Polypharmacy for Patients with Dementia from Primary Care Electronic Health Records: A Machine Learning Driven Longitudinal Study
    Longo, Elisabetta
    Burnett, Bruce
    Bauermeister, Sarah
    Zhou, Shang-Ming
    AGING AND DISEASE, 2023, 14 (02): : 548 - 559
  • [48] Primary care quality and addiction severity: A prospective cohort study
    Kim, Theresa W.
    Samet, Jeffrey H.
    Cheng, Debbie M.
    Winter, Michael R.
    Gelb Safran, Dana
    Saitz, Richard
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 42 (02) : 755 - 772
  • [49] Continuous and Transparent Access Control Framework for Electronic Health Records: A Preliminary Study
    Jayabalan, Manoj
    O'Daniel, Thomas
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICITISEE): OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES ON BIG DATA FUTURE INNOVATION, 2017, : 165 - 170
  • [50] Provider and Patient Determinants of Generic Levothyroxine Prescribing: An Electronic Health Records-Based Study
    Romanelli, Robert J.
    Nimbal, Vani
    Dutcher, Sarah K.
    Pu, Xia
    Segal, Jodi B.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 51 (08) : 640 - 648