Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

被引:26
|
作者
Tierney, William M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alpert, Sheri A. [3 ]
Byrket, Amy [1 ]
Caine, Kelly [3 ,4 ]
Leventhal, Jeremy C. [1 ]
Meslin, Eric M. [3 ]
Schwartz, Peter H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Eskenazi Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Clemson Univ Sch Comp, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
fair information practices; electronic health records; patient preferences; quality of care; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL GOPHER; SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; NETWORK; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-014-3053-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Applying Fair Information Practice principles to electronic health records (EHRs) requires allowing patient control over who views their data. METHODS: We designed a program that captures patients' preferences for provider access to an urban health system's EHR. Patients could allow or restrict providers' access to all data (diagnoses, medications, test results, reports, etc.) or only highly sensitive data (sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, drugs/alcohol, mental or reproductive health). Except for information in free-text reports, we redacted EHR data shown to providers according to patients' preferences. Providers could "break the glass" to display redacted information. We prospectively studied this system in one primary care clinic, noting redactions and when users "broke the glass," and surveyed providers about their experiences and opinions. RESULTS: Eight of nine eligible clinic physicians and all 23 clinic staff participated. All 105 patients who enrolled completed the preference program. Providers did not know which of their patients were enrolled, nor their preferences for accessing their EHRs. During the 6-month prospective study, 92 study patients (88 %) returned 261 times, during which providers viewed their EHRs 126 times (48 %). Providers " broke the glass" 102 times, 92 times for patients not in the study and ten times for six returning study patients, all of whom had restricted EHR access. Providers " broke the glass" for six (14 %) of 43 returning study patients with redacted data vs. zero among 49 study patients without redactions (p=0.01). Although 54 % of providers agreed that patients should have control over who sees their EHR information, 58 % believed restricting EHR access could harm provider-patient relationships and 71 % felt quality of care would suffer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients frequently preferred restricting provider access to their EHRs. Providers infrequently overrode patients' preferences to view hidden data. Providers believed that restricting EHR access would adversely impact patient care. Applying Fair Information Practice principles to EHRs will require balancing patient preferences, providers' needs, and health care quality.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measuring electronic communication networks in virtual care teams using electronic health records access-log data
    Zhu, Xi
    Tu, Shin-Ping
    Sewell, Daniel
    Yao, Nengliang
    Mishra, Vimal
    Dow, Alan
    Banas, Colin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 128 : 46 - 52
  • [32] Implementing Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Using the Theory of Change: Nigerian Case Study
    Adedeji, Taiwo
    Fraser, Hamish
    Scott, Philip
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [33] Indicators of dementia disease progression in primary care: An electronic health record cohort study
    Rathod-Mistry, Trishna
    Marshall, Michelle
    Campbell, Paul
    Bailey, James
    Chew-Graham, Carolyn A.
    Croft, Peter
    Frisher, Martin
    Hayward, Richard
    Negi, Rashi
    Robinson, Louise
    Singh, Swaran
    Sumathipala, Athula
    Thein, Nwe
    Walters, Kate
    Weich, Scott
    Jordan, Kelvin P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 (05) : 1499 - 1510
  • [34] Outpatient Electronic Health Records and the Clinical Care and Outcomes of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
    Reed, Mary
    Huang, Jie
    Graetz, Ilana
    Brand, Richard
    Hsu, John
    Fireman, Bruce
    Jaffe, Marc
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (07) : 482 - U66
  • [35] Electronic Health Records in the Cloud: Improving Primary Health Care Delivery in South Africa
    Cilliers, Liezel
    Wright, Graham
    MEDINFO 2017: PRECISION HEALTHCARE THROUGH INFORMATICS, 2017, 245 : 35 - 39
  • [36] To read or not to read - A cross-sectional study of Swedish primary care patients' adoption of patient accessible electronic health records
    Muli, Irene
    Cajander, Asa
    Hvitfeldt, Helena
    Lagerros, Ylva Trolle
    Soderberg, Daniel
    Sjoblom, Linnea
    Dahlgren, Anna
    Bertilson, Bo C.
    Farrokhnia, Nasim
    Amer-Wahlin, Isis
    Taloyan, Marina
    Hagglund, Maria
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [37] Drug Therapy for Rate and Rhythm Control in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Cross-sectional Study With Electronic Health Records in a Primary Care Cohort
    Giner-Soriano, Maria
    Roso-Llorach, Albert
    Vedia Urgell, Cristina
    Casellas, Aina
    Ferreira-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Capella, Dolors
    Morros, Rosa
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 38 (04) : 863 - 873
  • [38] CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS TO THE SAFETY OF INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PATIENTS: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW
    Ferreira de Sousa, Paulino Artur
    Marcon Dal Sasso, Grace Teresinha
    Carvalho Barra, Daniela Couto
    TEXTO & CONTEXTO ENFERMAGEM, 2012, 21 (04) : 971 - 979
  • [39] Patterns of routine primary care for osteoarthritis in the UK: a cross-sectional electronic health records study
    Jackson, Holly
    Barnett, Lauren A.
    Jordan, Kelvin P.
    Dziedzic, Krysia S.
    Cottrell, Elizabeth
    Finney, Andrew G.
    Paskins, Zoe
    Edwards, John J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [40] Quality Improvement of prescribing safety: a pilot study in primary care using UK electronic health records
    Booth, Helen P.
    Gallagher, Arlene M.
    Mullett, David
    Carty, Lucy
    Padmanabhan, Shivani
    Myles, Puja R.
    Welburn, Stephen J.
    Hoghton, Matthew
    Rafi, Imran
    Valentine, Janet
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (686) : E605 - E611