Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

被引:26
|
作者
Tierney, William M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alpert, Sheri A. [3 ]
Byrket, Amy [1 ]
Caine, Kelly [3 ,4 ]
Leventhal, Jeremy C. [1 ]
Meslin, Eric M. [3 ]
Schwartz, Peter H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Eskenazi Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Clemson Univ Sch Comp, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
fair information practices; electronic health records; patient preferences; quality of care; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL GOPHER; SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; NETWORK; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-014-3053-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Applying Fair Information Practice principles to electronic health records (EHRs) requires allowing patient control over who views their data. METHODS: We designed a program that captures patients' preferences for provider access to an urban health system's EHR. Patients could allow or restrict providers' access to all data (diagnoses, medications, test results, reports, etc.) or only highly sensitive data (sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, drugs/alcohol, mental or reproductive health). Except for information in free-text reports, we redacted EHR data shown to providers according to patients' preferences. Providers could "break the glass" to display redacted information. We prospectively studied this system in one primary care clinic, noting redactions and when users "broke the glass," and surveyed providers about their experiences and opinions. RESULTS: Eight of nine eligible clinic physicians and all 23 clinic staff participated. All 105 patients who enrolled completed the preference program. Providers did not know which of their patients were enrolled, nor their preferences for accessing their EHRs. During the 6-month prospective study, 92 study patients (88 %) returned 261 times, during which providers viewed their EHRs 126 times (48 %). Providers " broke the glass" 102 times, 92 times for patients not in the study and ten times for six returning study patients, all of whom had restricted EHR access. Providers " broke the glass" for six (14 %) of 43 returning study patients with redacted data vs. zero among 49 study patients without redactions (p=0.01). Although 54 % of providers agreed that patients should have control over who sees their EHR information, 58 % believed restricting EHR access could harm provider-patient relationships and 71 % felt quality of care would suffer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients frequently preferred restricting provider access to their EHRs. Providers infrequently overrode patients' preferences to view hidden data. Providers believed that restricting EHR access would adversely impact patient care. Applying Fair Information Practice principles to EHRs will require balancing patient preferences, providers' needs, and health care quality.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
    William M. Tierney
    Sheri A. Alpert
    Amy Byrket
    Kelly Caine
    Jeremy C. Leventhal
    Eric M. Meslin
    Peter H. Schwartz
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 31 - 37
  • [2] Patient Preferences in Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
    Peter H. Schwartz
    Kelly Caine
    Sheri A. Alpert
    Eric M. Meslin
    Aaron E. Carroll
    William M. Tierney
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 25 - 30
  • [3] Patient Preferences in Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
    Schwartz, Peter H.
    Caine, Kelly
    Alpert, Sheri A.
    Meslin, Eric M.
    Carroll, Aaron E.
    Tierney, William M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S25 - S30
  • [4] Access to electronic health records in primary care - a survey of patients' views
    Pyper, C
    Amery, J
    Watson, M
    Crook, C
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2004, 10 (11): : SR17 - SR22
  • [5] Designing a System for Patients Controlling Providers' Access to their Electronic Health Records: Organizational and Technical Challenges
    Leventhal, Jeremy C.
    Cummins, Jonathan A.
    Schwartz, Peter H.
    Martin, Douglas K.
    Tierney, William M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S17 - S24
  • [6] Designing a System for Patients Controlling Providers’ Access to their Electronic Health Records: Organizational and Technical Challenges
    Jeremy C. Leventhal
    Jonathan A. Cummins
    Peter H. Schwartz
    Douglas K. Martin
    William M. Tierney
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 17 - 24
  • [7] Monitoring Suicidal Patients in Primary Care Using Electronic Health Records
    Anderson, Heather D.
    Pace, Wilson D.
    Brandt, Elias
    Nielsen, Rodney D.
    Allen, Richard R.
    Libby, Anne M.
    West, David R.
    Valuck, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [8] Electronic health records use in primary care of patients with multimorbidity
    Lang, Tally
    Shadmi, Efrat
    Agmon, Maayan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2019, 19
  • [9] Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada
    Orchard, Margo C.
    Dobrow, Mark J.
    Paszat, Lawrence
    Jiang, Hedy
    Brown, Patrick
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 9
  • [10] Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care
    Mold, Freda
    de Lusignan, Simon
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Majeed, Azeem
    Wyatt, Jeremy C.
    Quinn, Tom
    Cavill, Mary
    Franco, Christina
    Chauhan, Umesh
    Blakey, Hannah
    Kataria, Neha
    Arvanitis, Theodoros N.
    Ellis, Beverley
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2015, 65 (632) : E141 - E151