Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study

被引:28
作者
Lopez, Christian J. [1 ]
Edwards, Beth [1 ]
Langelier, David M. [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Eugene K. [1 ,2 ]
Chafranskaia, Aleksandra [1 ,3 ]
Jones, Jennifer M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Canc Rehabil & Survivorship Program, Dept Support Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 102卷 / 07期
关键词
Cancer survivors; COVID-19; Neoplasms; Rehabilitation; Survivorship; Telemedicine; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; HEALTH LITERACY; TELEHEALTH; CARE; TELEREHABILITATION; IMPLEMENTATION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.002
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the adaptations made to implement virtual cancer rehabilitation at the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, as well as understand the experiences of patients and providers adapting to virtual care. Design: Multimethod study. Setting: Cancer center. Participants: A total of 1968 virtual patient visits were completed during the study period. Adult survivors of cancer (n =12) and oncology health care providers (n =12) participated in semi-structured interviews. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Framework-driven categorization of program modifications, qualitative interviews with patients and providers, and a comparison of process outcomes with the previous 90 days of in-person care via referrals, completed visits and attendance, method of delivery, weekly capacities, and wait times. Results: The majority of program visits could be adapted to virtual delivery, with format, setting, and content modifications. Virtual care demonstrated an increase or maintenance in the number of completed visits by appointment type compared with in-person care, with attendance ranging from 80%-93%. For most appointment types, capacities increased, whereas wait times decreased slightly. Overall, 168 patients (11% of all assessments and follow-ups) assessed virtually were identified by providers as requiring an in-person appointment because of reassessment of musculoskeletal and/or neurologic impairment (n= 109, 65%) and lymphedema (n =59, 35%). The interviews (n =24) revealed that virtual care was an acceptable alternative in some circumstances, with the ability to (1) increase access to care; (2) provide a sense of reassurance during a time of isolation; and (3) provide confidence in learning skills to self-manage impairments. Conclusions: Many appointments can be successfully adapted to virtual formats to deliver cancer rehabilitation programming. Based on our findings, we provide practical recommendations that can be implemented by providers and programs to facilitate the adoption and delivery of virtual care. (C) 2021 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1293
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   CaRE @ Home: Pilot Study of an Online Multidimensional Cancer Rehabilitation and Exercise Program for Cancer Survivors [J].
MacDonald, Anne Marie ;
Chafranskaia, Aleksandra ;
Lopez, Christian J. ;
Maganti, Manjula ;
Bernstein, Lori J. ;
Chang, Eugene ;
Langelier, David Michael ;
Obadia, Maya ;
Edwards, Beth ;
Oh, Paul ;
Bender, Jacqueline L. ;
Alibhai, Shabbir Mh ;
Jones, Jennifer M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (10) :1-25
[22]   Practical Considerations for Implementing Virtual Care in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation For the Pandemic and Beyond [J].
McIntyre, McKyla ;
Robinson, Lawrence R. ;
Mayo, Amanda .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2020, 99 (06) :464-467
[23]   Cancer survivors' experience of exercise-based cancer rehabilitation - a meta-synthesis of qualitative research [J].
Midtgaard, Julie ;
Hammer, Nanna Maria ;
Andersen, Christina ;
Larsen, Anders ;
Bruun, Ditte-Marie ;
Jarden, Mary .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (05) :609-617
[24]   Addressing the needs of cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Nekhlyudov, Larissa ;
Duijts, Saskia ;
Hudson, Shawna V. ;
Jones, Jennifer M. ;
Keogh, Justin ;
Love, Brad ;
Lustberg, Maryam ;
Smith, Katherine Clegg ;
Tevaarwerk, Amye ;
Yu, Xinhua ;
Feuerstein, Michael .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2020, 14 (05) :601-606
[25]   Keeping Patients With Cancer Exercising in the Age of COVID-19 [J].
Newton, Robert U. ;
Hart, Nicolas H. ;
Clay, Tim .
JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2020, 16 (10) :656-+
[26]   A health services research agenda to fully integrate cancer rehabilitation into oncology care [J].
Pergolotti, Mackenzi ;
Alfano, Catherine M. ;
Cernich, Alison N. ;
Yabroff, K. Robin ;
Manning, Peter R. ;
de Moor, Janet S. ;
Hahn, Erin E. ;
Cheville, Andrea L. ;
Mohile, Supriya G. .
CANCER, 2019, 125 (22) :3908-3916
[27]   Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of eHealth Services: Systematic Literature Analysis [J].
Schreiweis, Bjoern ;
Pobiruchin, Monika ;
Strotbaum, Veronika ;
Suleder, Julian ;
Wiesner, Martin ;
Bergh, Bjoern .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (11)
[28]   Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation: An essential component of quality care and survivorship [J].
Silver, Julie K. ;
Baima, Jennifer ;
Mayer, R. Samuel .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2013, 63 (05) :295-317
[29]   The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions [J].
Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey ;
Baumann, Ana A. ;
Miller, Christopher J. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (1)
[30]   Telehealth in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review [J].
Tenforde, Adam S. ;
Hefner, Jaye E. ;
Kodish-Wachs, Jodi E. ;
Iaccarino, Mary A. ;
Paganoni, Sabrina .
PM&R, 2017, 9 (05) :S51-S58