User Experience in the Work Domain: A Longitudinal Field Study

被引:16
作者
Harbich, Stefanie [1 ]
Hassenzahl, Marc [2 ]
机构
[1] Siemens AG, CT RDA SSI UXD DE, Gunther Scharowsky Str 1, DE-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Folkwang Univ Arts, Experience & Interact, Fac Design, Univ Str 12, DE-45141 Essen, Germany
关键词
HCI; HCI design and evaluation methods; field studies; longitudinal; multilevel analysis; work domain; user experience; MICROCOMPUTER PLAYFULNESS; PRODUCT; USABILITY; DESIGN; CURVE;
D O I
10.1093/iwc/iww022
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Of the many concepts of user experience (UX), only a few address UX in the work domain. In addition, while most underline the dynamic nature of UX, not many studies take an explicit longitudinal approach. This article presents data about how the UX of work-related interactive systems changed over the course of 13 weeks. Specifically, we studied the change in four groups of behaviors-execute, evolve, expand and engage-which we deem important for goal achievement. We examined the impact of user attributes (playfulness, computer expertise) as well as product attributes (pragmatic quality, hedonic quality). Multilevel analysis (MLA) provided the methodological frame for the statistical analysis. Since MLA is rather uncommon in human-computer interaction, we thoroughly discuss it and clarify its advantages over repeated-measures analysis of variance. Our study verified that time is an important predictor, confirming that UX (i.e. particular goal achievement-related behaviors and the perception of product attributes) changes over time. The pattern of change differed among participants in terms of rate and direction of change, and those differences even increased over the course of our study. Product attributes influenced change considerably, while playfulness had an impact on engaging behavior in the sense that more playful participants lost interest even faster.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 324
页数:19
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 924111 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[3]  
Bargas-Avila J. A, 2011, P CHI 11 C HUM FACT
[4]  
Bartlett F.C., 1932, REMEMBERING STUDY EX, V14
[5]  
Carver C. S., 1998, SELF REGULATION BEHA
[6]   A TOOLKIT FOR APPRAISING THE LONG-TERM USABILITY OF A TEXT EDITOR [J].
COOK, R ;
KAY, J ;
RYAN, G ;
THOMAS, RC .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 1995, 4 (02) :131-154
[7]  
Courage C., 2009, P INT C HUMAN FACTOR, P4791, DOI DOI 10.1145/1520340.1520742
[8]  
Courage C., 2010, P 28 INT C HUM FACT, P3167, DOI DOI 10.1145/1753846.1753946
[9]   GOAL HIERARCHIES AND PLAN REVISION [J].
CROPANZANO, R ;
CITERA, M ;
HOWES, J .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 1995, 19 (02) :77-98
[10]  
Davies R.B., 1994, ANAL SOCIAL POLITICA, P20