Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme

被引:8
作者
Marshall, Martin [1 ]
Mountford, James [2 ]
Gamet, Kirsten [3 ]
Gungor, Gulsen [4 ]
Burke, Conor [5 ]
Hudson, Robyn [6 ]
Morris, Steve [1 ]
Patel, Nishma [1 ]
Koczan, Phil [2 ]
Meaker, Rob [5 ]
Chantler, Cyril [2 ]
Roberts, Christopher Michael [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] UCLPartners, London W1T 7HA, England
[3] Patients Know Best, Cambridge, England
[4] NHS Redbridge Clin Commissioning Grp, Ilford, Essex, England
[5] Barking & Dagenham, Redbridge & Havering Clin Commissioning Grp, Romford, Essex, England
[6] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] UCLPartners, Integrated Comorbid Programme, London W1T 7HA, England
[8] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, London, England
关键词
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; general practice; large-scale improvement; ORGANIZATIONS; INTERVENTION; TEAMS;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp14X682801
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. Aim To understand the enablers and constraints to implementing a large-scale quality improvement programme in general practice, designed to improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design and setting A qualitative study of 189 general practices in a socioeconomically and ethnically-mixed, urban area in east London, UK. Method Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with people leading the programme and 17 in-depth interviews with those participating in it. Participants were local health system leaders, clinicians, and managers. A theoretical framework derived from evidence-based guidance for improvement programmes was used to interpret the findings. A complex improvement intervention took place with social and technical elements including training and mentorship, guidance, analytical tools, and data feedback. Results Practice staff wanted to participate in and learn from well-designed collaborative improvement projects. Nevertheless, there were limitations in the capacities and capabilities of the workforce to undertake systematic improvement, significant problems with access to and the quality of data, and tensions between the narrative-based generalist orientation of many primary care clinicians and the quantitative single-disease orientation that has characterised much of the quality improvement movement to date. Conclusion Improvement guidance derived largely from hospital-based studies is, for the most part, applicable to improvement efforts in primary care settings, although large-scale change in general practice presents some particular challenges. These need to be better understood and addressed if improvement initiatives are to be effective.
引用
收藏
页码:E745 / E751
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
  • [2] Baker G.R., 2008, HIGH PERFORMING HEAL
  • [3] Bate P, 2008, ORGANISING FOR QUALI
  • [4] Studying large-scale programmes to improve patient safety in whole care systems: Challenges for research
    Benn, Jonathan
    Burnett, Susan
    Parand, Anam
    Pinto, Anna
    Iskander, Sandra
    Vincent, Charles
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 69 (12) : 1767 - 1776
  • [5] The Four Habits of High-Value Health Care Organizations
    Bohmer, Richard M. J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (22) : 2045 - 2047
  • [6] Checkland Kath, 2003, J Health Serv Res Policy, V8, P248, DOI 10.1258/135581903322403335
  • [7] Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Bosk, Charles L.
    Aveling, Emma Louise
    Goeschel, Christine A.
    Pronovost, Peter J.
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2011, 89 (02) : 167 - 205
  • [8] Ferlie E, 2010, REPORT FOR THE NATIO
  • [9] Greenhalgh T, 2003, NARRATIVE BASED HEAL
  • [10] Grol R, 2013, IMPROVING PATIENT CARE: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGE IN HEALTH CARE, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118525975