Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: a review of the scholarship

被引:81
作者
Gerlak, Andrea K. [1 ]
Heikkila, Tanya [2 ]
Smolinski, Sharon L. [2 ]
Huitema, Dave [3 ,4 ]
Armitage, Derek [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Udall Ctr Studies Publ Policy, 803 East First St, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Publ Affairs, 1380 Lawrence St,Suite 500, Denver, CO 80204 USA
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, Boelelaan 1087, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Open Univ, Fac Management Sci & Technol, Dept Sci, Valkenburgerweg 177, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
Learning; Environmental challenges; Governance; Policy; ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE; SOIL CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY; TOOLS; CAPACITY; LESSONS; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11077-017-9278-0
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
In acknowledgement of the complexity of environmental challenges, research on learning in environmental policy has grown substantially over the past two decades across a range of disciplines. Despite this growth, there are few comprehensive assessments of the literature on learning in environmental policy. This article fills this gap by providing insights on the overall coherence and impact of this body of scholarship. To do so, we analyze a sample of 163 articles from 2004 to 2014 using a standardized coding framework. The results provide an in-depth assessment of the status of the literature on learning in the context of environmental policy, as well as the quality of the literature. We demonstrate that despite the diversity in research questions and goals, the literature is lacking with respect to diversity in cases and context, theoretical development, clear conceptualization and operationalization of learning, and advancements in empirical approaches to study learning. From these insights, we discuss the challenges and opportunities for scholars in studying learning and provide recommendations for building the theoretical and methodological rigor of the field.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 371
页数:37
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Policy Change and Learning in Response to Extreme Flood Events in Hungary: An Advocacy Coalition Approach [J].
Albright, Elizabeth A. .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2011, 39 (03) :485-511
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ENVISIONING SUSTAINA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PLANNING COMPLEXITY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, THEORIES POLICY PROC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Environ. Policy Gov, DOI [10.1002/eet.509, DOI 10.1002/EET.509]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Approaches to social research
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach
[8]   Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning [J].
Armitage, Derek ;
Marschke, Melissa ;
Plummer, Ryan .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2008, 18 (01) :86-98
[9]   Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation [J].
Baird, Julia ;
Plummer, Ryan ;
Haug, Constanze ;
Huitema, Dave .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 27 :51-63
[10]   Guiding Climate Change Adaptation Within Vulnerable Natural Resource Management Systems [J].
Bardsley, Douglas K. ;
Sweeney, Susan M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 45 (05) :1127-1141