Factors that control the angle of shear bands in geodynamic numerical models of brittle deformation

被引:112
作者
Kaus, Boris J. P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Earth Sci, ETH Zentrum, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Lithospheric deformation; Rheology; Plastic deformation; Viscoelastoplasticity; Viscoplasticity; Numerical modelling; Long-term tectonics; BIAXIAL TESTS; LOCALIZATION; FORMULATION; FLOWS; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.tecto.2009.08.042
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Numerical models of brittle deformation on geological timescales typically use a pressure-dependent (Mohr-Coulomb or Drucker-Prager) plastic flow law to simulate plastic failure. Despite its widespread usage in geodynamic models of lithospheric deformation, however, certain aspects of such plasticity models remain poorly understood. One of the most prominent questions in this respect is: what are the factors that control the angle of the resulting shear bands? Recent theoretical work suggest that both Roscoe (45 degrees), Coulomb angles (45 +/- phi/2, where phi is the angle of internal friction) and Arthur angles (45 degrees +/- (phi + psi/4) where psi is the dilation angle), as well as all intermediate angles are possible. Published numerical models, however, show a large range of shear band angles with some codes favoring Arthur angles, whereas others yield Coulomb angles. In order to understand what causes the differences between the various numerical models, here I perform systematic numerical simulations of shear localization around an inclusion of given length scale. Both numerical (element type), geometrical and rheological (viscoplastic versus viscoelastoplastic) effects are studied. Results indicate that the main factor, controlling shear band angle, is the non-dimensional ratio between the length scale of the heterogeneity d and the size of the numerical mesh Delta x. Coulomb angles are observed only in cases where the inclusion is resolved well (d/Delta x > 5-10), and in which it is located sufficiently far from the boundary of the box. In most other cases, either Arthur or Roscoe orientations are observed. If heterogeneities are one element in size, Coulomb angles are thus unlikely to develop irrespective of the employed numerical resolution. Whereas differences in element types and rheology do have consequences for the maximum obtainable strain rates inside the shear bands, they only have a minor effect on shear band angles. Shear bands, initiated from random noise or from interactions of shear bands with model boundaries or other shear bands, result in stress heterogeneities with dimensionless length scales d/Delta x similar to 1-2. Such shear bands are thus expected to form Roscoe or Arthur orientations, consistent with the findings in previous numerical models. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 47
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HERON
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, MATH ITS APPL
[3]   PLASTIC-DEFORMATION AND FAILURE IN GRANULAR MEDIA [J].
ARTHUR, JRF ;
DUNSTAN, T ;
ALANI, QAJL ;
ASSADI, A .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1977, 27 (01) :53-74
[4]   DOUAR: A new three-dimensional creeping flow numerical model for the solution of geological problems [J].
Braun, Jean ;
Thieulot, Cedric ;
Fullsack, Philippe ;
DeKool, Marthijn ;
Beaumont, Christopher ;
Huismans, Ritske .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2008, 171 (1-4) :76-91
[5]   Modes of faulting at mid-ocean ridges [J].
Buck, WR ;
Lavier, LL ;
Poliakov, ANB .
NATURE, 2005, 434 (7034) :719-723
[6]   The numerical sandbox: Comparison of model results for a shortening and an extension experiment [J].
Buiter, Susanne J. H. ;
Babeyko, Andrey Yu. ;
Ellis, Susan ;
Gerya, Taras V. ;
Kaus, Boris J. P. ;
Kellner, Antje ;
Schreurs, Guido ;
Yamada, Yasuhiro .
ANALOGUE AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF CRUSTAL-SCALE PROCESSES, 2006, 253 :29-+
[7]   FRICTION OF ROCKS [J].
BYERLEE, J .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1978, 116 (4-5) :615-626
[8]  
COULOMB C. A., 1773, MEMOIRES MATH PHYS P, V7, P343
[9]   MILAMIN: MATLAB-based finite element method solver for large problems [J].
Dabrowski, M. ;
Krotkiewski, M. ;
Schmid, D. W. .
GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2008, 9
[10]  
de Souza Neto E, 2009, COMPUTATIONAL METHOD