Valuing ocean and coastal resources: a review of practical examples and issues for further action

被引:83
作者
Ledoux, L [1 ]
Turner, RK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Ctr Social & Econ Res Global Environm, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00088-1
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
This review article examines the importance of valuing environmental resources in the context of sustainable development. The different values stemming from ocean and coastal resources, relevant methodologies and issues raised by valuation approaches are reviewed. The authors then present practical policy-relevant valuation examples, and conclude by outlining progress since 1992 and remaining challenges. It is argued that while the Rio summit has shifted somewhat the emphasis from classical cost-benefit analysis to safe minimum standards through the adoption of the precautionary principle, economic valuation still provides useful information to decision-makers and should be part of a holistic decision-making process. It should be recognised, however, that although valuation techniques have been refined and linked to reliability protocols, they remain imperfect and for some commentators controversial. Further progress is needed on assigning monetary values but also on decision-making systems that better integrate monetary, social, and natural science criteria. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 616
页数:34
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Adger W. N., 1997, Commonwealth Forestry Review, V76, P198
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SUSTAINABLE ENV EC M
[3]  
[Anonymous], WORLD BANK IND
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Earth Summit Agreements, A Guide and Assessment
[5]  
Energy and Environmental programme
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Investing in Water Quality: Measuring Benefits, Costs and Risks
[7]  
[Anonymous], LOICZ REPORTS STUDIE
[9]  
BATEMAN IJ, 2000, 200025 CSERGE U E AN
[10]   ENDANGERED SPECIES AND UNCERTAINTY - ECONOMICS OF A SAFE MINIMUM STANDARD [J].
BISHOP, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1978, 60 (01) :10-18