Duloxetine for pain in fibromyalgia in adults: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

被引:29
作者
Lian, Yan-Na [1 ]
Wang, Yi [2 ]
Zhang, Ying [3 ]
Yang, Chun-Xiao [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Physiol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Med Univ, Teaching Expt Ctr Biotechnol, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Physiol, Xuefu Rd 194, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[4] Harbin Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Neurol, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Fibromyalgia; duloxetine; pain relief; adverse events; withdrawal; meta-analysis; DOUBLE-BLIND; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PLACEBO; EFFICACY; SAFETY; MANAGEMENT; 6-MONTH;
D O I
10.1080/00207454.2019.1664510
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the analgesic efficacy of duloxetine (DLX) for fibromyalgia (FM) and find out which dosage between 60 mg/d DLX and 120 mg/d DLX was more suitable for clinical application. Methods: A systematic search through multiple databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ProQuest, PubMed) was conducted from 2000 until 7 March 2019. All steps were performed by two or more independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed to report the effects of DLX on pain reduction and its accompanied adverse events. Results: This meta-analysis, including seven studies with 2642 FM patients, demonstrated that DLX could produce greater pain relief in FM than placebo (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37 to -0.16). The risk ratio (RR) of at least 30% pain relief was 1.31 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.44); the RR of at least 50% pain relief was 1.46 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.67). However, the patients with DLX who suffered adverse events were more common than the ones with placebo (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.23). The withdrawal effect included adverse event withdrawal and lack of efficacy withdrawal. The subgroup analyses of withdrawal effects demonstrated that 120 mg/d DLX had a higher incidence (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.15) than 60 mg/d DLX (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.93). Conclusions: In general, DLX was a great choice for pain relief in FM. Moreover, 60 mg/d DLX produced less withdrawal effects than 120 mg/d DLX.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 82
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] DULOXETINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF FIBROMYALGIA
    Acuna, Carmen
    [J]. DRUGS OF TODAY, 2008, 44 (10) : 725 - 734
  • [2] Duloxetine and Pregabalin for Pain Management in Multiple Rheumatic Diseases Associated with Fibromyalgia
    Angeletti, Chiara
    Guetti, Cristiana
    Piroli, Alba
    Angeletti, Paolo Matteo
    Paladini, Antonella
    Ciccozzi, Alessandra
    Marinangeli, Franco
    Varrassi, Giustino
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2013, 13 (08) : 657 - 662
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine 30 mg/d in Patients With Fibromyalgia A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study
    Arnold, Lesley M.
    Zhang, Shuyu
    Pangallo, Beth A.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 28 (09) : 775 - 781
  • [4] Flexible Dosed Duloxetine in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Arnold, Lesley M.
    Clauw, Daniel
    Wang, Fujun
    Ahl, Jonna
    Gaynor, Paula J.
    Wohlreich, Madelane M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 37 (12) : 2578 - 2586
  • [5] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in the treatment of women with fibromyalgia with or without major depressive disorder
    Arnold, LM
    Rosen, A
    Pritchett, YL
    D'Souza, DN
    Goldstein, DJ
    Iyengar, S
    Wernicke, JF
    [J]. PAIN, 2005, 119 (1-3) : 5 - 15
  • [6] A double-blind, multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia patients with or without major depressive disorder
    Arnold, LM
    Lu, YL
    Crofford, LJ
    Wohlreich, M
    Detke, MJ
    Iyengar, S
    Goldstein, DJ
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2004, 50 (09): : 2974 - 2984
  • [7] Fibromyalgia: The Prototypical Central Sensitivity Syndrome
    Boomershine, Chad S.
    [J]. CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REVIEWS, 2015, 11 (02) : 131 - 145
  • [8] Chappell AS, 2008, INT J GEN MED, V1, P91
  • [9] Dussias Peter, 2010, Psychiatry (Edgmont), V7, P15
  • [10] Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Wyrwich, Kathleen W.
    Beaton, Dorcas
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Farrar, John T.
    Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A.
    Jensen, Mark P.
    Kerns, Robert D.
    Ader, Deborah N.
    Brandenburg, Nancy
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Cella, David
    Chandler, Julie
    Cowan, Penny
    Dimitrova, Rozalina
    Dionne, Raymond
    Hertz, Sharon
    Jadad, Alejandro R.
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Kehlet, Henrik
    Kramer, Lynn D.
    Manning, Donald C.
    McCormick, Cynthia
    McDermott, Michael P.
    McQuay, Henry J.
    Patel, Sanjay
    Porter, Linda
    Quessy, Steve
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Rauschkolb, Christine
    Revickl, Dennis A.
    Rothman, Margaret
    Schmader, Kenneth E.
    Stacey, Brett R.
    Stauffer, Joseph W.
    Von Stein, Thorsten
    White, Richard E.
    Witter, James
    Zavislc, Stojan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 9 (02) : 105 - 121