A New, Practical Animal Welfare Assessment for Dairy Farmers

被引:17
作者
van Eerdenburg, Frank J. C. M. [1 ]
Di Giacinto, Alice M. [2 ]
Hulsen, Jan [3 ]
Snel, Bert [4 ]
Stegeman, J. Arjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, NL-3584 CL Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Adaptat Physiol Grp, Dept Anim Sci, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Vetvice CowSignals, NL-4614 PC Bergen Op Zoom, Netherlands
[4] DLV Advies, NL-7418 EV Deventer, Netherlands
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
animal welfare; dairy cattle; Welfare Quality(&#174); water supply; integument alterations; economic return; CATTLE WELFARE; TIME-BUDGETS; BEHAVIOR; LAMENESS; PROTOCOL; HEALTH; COWS; SENSITIVITY; PARAMETERS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.3390/ani11030881
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary To determine the level of welfare on a dairy farm is a complex task. There is no protocol available that can serve as a 'gold standard'. The Welfare Quality protocol is the most extensive one, but it takes about a full day to perform. We, therefore, examined if it would be possible to replace the time-consuming parts, like lengthy behavioural observations, with simple measurements in the environment. This resulted in a new Welfare Monitor that can be executed in 1.5 h on a farm with 100 cows. Welfare assessment was appreciated by the farmers, and they responded to advice for improvements on their farm. Besides promoting better welfare, this approach also led to a better financial result for the farms. The Welfare Quality(R) assessment protocol (WQ) is the most extensive way to measure animal welfare. This study was set up to determine if resource-based welfare indicators, that are easier and faster to measure, could replace the more time consuming, animal-based measurements of the WQ. The WQ was applied on 60 dairy farms in the Netherlands, with good, moderate and poor welfare. The WQ protocol classified most farms (87%) as 'acceptable'. Several of the animal-based measures of WQ correlated well with measures in the environment. Using these correlations, an alternative welfare assessment protocol (new Welfare Monitor) was designed, which takes approximately 1.5 h for a farm with 100 dairy cows. Because the opinion of farmers about welfare assessment is important if one wants to improve conditions for the cows at a farm, another objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the new Welfare Monitor for the farmer. Over two years, the farms were visited, and advice was given to improve the conditions at the farm. After the first welfare assessment and advice, farmers improved the conditions for their cows substantially. Farms where the category score had increased made more improvements on average than those that did not upgrade.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Can animal-based welfare assessment be simplified? A comparison of the Welfare Quality® protocol for dairy cattle and the simpler and less time-consuming protocol developed by the Danish Cattle Federation [J].
Andreasen, S. N. ;
Sandoe, P. ;
Forkman, B. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2014, 23 (01) :81-94
[2]   The welfare of dairy cows is improved in relation to cleanliness and integument alterations on the hocks and lameness when sand is used as stall surface [J].
Andreasen, S. N. ;
Forkman, B. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (09) :4961-4967
[3]  
Bewley J., 2010, OPPORTUNITIES IMPROV
[4]   Strategies to analyze milk losses caused by diseases with potential incidence throughout the lactation: A lameness example [J].
Bicalho, R. C. ;
Warnick, L. D. ;
Guard, C. L. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2008, 91 (07) :2653-2661
[5]  
Botreau R, 2009, ANIM WELFARE, V18, P363
[6]   Sensitivity of the Welfare Quality® broiler chicken protocol to differences between intensively reared indoor flocks: which factors explain overall classification? [J].
Buijs, S. ;
Ampe, B. ;
Tuyttens, F. A. M. .
ANIMAL, 2017, 11 (02) :244-253
[7]   Drinking behavior of lactating dairy cows and prediction of their water intake [J].
Cardot, V. ;
Le Roux, Y. ;
Jurjanz, S. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2008, 91 (06) :2257-2264
[8]   The cost of different types of lameness in dairy cows calculated by dynamic programming [J].
Cha, E. ;
Hertl, J. A. ;
Bar, D. ;
Groehn, Y. T. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2010, 97 (01) :1-8
[9]   Applying the reasoned action approach to understanding health protection and health risk behaviors [J].
Conner, Mark ;
McEachan, Rosemary ;
Lawton, Rebecca ;
Gardner, Peter .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 195 :140-148
[10]   Sensitivity of the integrated Welfare Quality® scores to changing values of individual dairy cattle welfare measures [J].
de Graaf, S. ;
Ampe, B. ;
Buijs, S. ;
Andreasen, S. N. ;
Des Roches, A. De Boyer ;
Van Eerdenburg, F. J. C. M. ;
Haskell, M. J. ;
Kirchner, M. K. ;
Mounier, L. ;
Radeski, M. ;
Winkler, C. ;
Bijttebier, J. ;
Lauwers, L. ;
Verbeke, W. ;
Tuyttens, F. A. M. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2018, 27 (02) :157-166