Port system evolution - the case of Latin America and the Caribbean

被引:54
作者
Wilmsmeier, Gordon [1 ]
Monios, Jason [2 ]
Perez-Salas, Gabriel [1 ]
机构
[1] UN ECLAC, Santiago, Chile
[2] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Transport Res Inst, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Container port development; Deconcentration; Decentralisation; Peripherality; Latin America; Liner shipping; GOVERNANCE REFORMS; SEAPORTS; HUB;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The explosion of global container trade in the last two decades has significantly influenced the port geography of Latin America & the Caribbean (LAC), leading to a concentration of container traffic at selected ports. Theory suggests that, as port systems become mature, they tend to deconcentration, partly due to the emergence of secondary ports. Previous research has examined the region's dominant ports, but an unanswered research question is how the evolution of this port system is influencing and being influenced by the actions of those ports currently occupying a secondary rank in the LAC port hierarchy. The methodology is based primarily on analysis of time series data on container movements between 1997 and 2012, revealing patterns of cargo flows and transhipment location choices. The institutional context of devolution processes and new investments in the region provides additional insight into the performance of selected ports. From a theoretical perspective, this analysis is situated within the context of recent institutional approaches that examine the port's ability to act through critical moments and junctures, in order to deepen understanding of which of the various factors influencing port system deconcentration are the most sensitive to successful institutional adaptations. Results show that the manufacturing of strategic locations can be successful and may have driven the emergence of secondary ports in the LAC system. This finding demonstrates how path dependence can be challenged by new developments, the identification and success of which are nevertheless contingent on factors such as the first mover advantage, port planning regimes and diversification of port roles. The paper identifies some of the key factors influencing the transition of a port system from concentration at a few dominant ports to a deconcentrated system of primary and secondary ports, which can be applied to other port systems in future research. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 221
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Alphaliner, 2012, EV CARR FLEETS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1980, AUTOPOIESIS COGNITIO
  • [3] Barke M, 1986, Transport and Trade. Conceptual Frameworks in Geography
  • [4] Beresford A.K.C., 2004, Maritime Policy and Management, V31, number, P93, DOI DOI 10.1080/0308883042000205061
  • [5] A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports
    Bichou, K
    Gray, R
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 39 (01) : 75 - 92
  • [6] Bird JamesH., 1963, MAJOR SEAPORTS UK
  • [7] Cullinane K., 2000, J. Transport Geogr., V8, P181, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00010-7, 10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00010-7]
  • [8] Cullinane K. P. B., 2011, HDB TERMINAL PLANNIN
  • [9] Drewry Shipping Consultants, 2012, GLOB CONT TERM OP AN
  • [10] Going West? Spatial polarization of the North Korean port system
    Ducruet, Cesar
    Roussin, Stanislas
    Jo, Jin-Cheol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 17 (05) : 357 - 368