A review of robotic surgical training: establishing a curriculum and credentialing process in ophthalmology

被引:7
作者
He, Bonnie [1 ]
de Smet, Marc D. [2 ]
Sodhi, Mohit [1 ]
Etminan, Mahyar [1 ]
Maberley, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
GLOBAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; SURGERY; VALIDATION; SKILLS; FEASIBILITY; COMPETENCE; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41433-021-01599-7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Ophthalmic surgery requires a highly dexterous and precise surgical approach to work within the small confines of the eye, and the use of robotics offers numerous potential advantages to current surgical techniques. However, there is a lag in the development of a comprehensive training and credentialing system for robotic eye surgery, and certification of robotic skills proficiency relies heavily on industry leadership. We conducted a literature review on the curricular elements of established robotics training programs as well as privileging guidelines from various institutions to outline key components in training and credentialing robotic surgeons for ophthalmic surgeries. Based on our literature review and informal discussions between the authors and other robotic ophthalmic experts, we recommend that the overall training framework for robotic ophthalmic trainees proceeds in a stepwise, competency-based manner from didactic learning, to simulation exercises, to finally operative experiences. Nontechnical skills such as device troubleshooting and interprofessional teamwork should also be formally taught and evaluated. In addition, we have developed an assessment tool based on validated global rating scales for surgical skills that may be used to monitor the progress of trainees. Finally, we propose a graduating model for granting privileges to robotic surgeons. Further work will need to be undertaken to assess the feasibility, efficacy and integrity of the training curriculum and credentialing practices for robotic ophthalmic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3192 / 3201
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] External validation of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)
    Aghazadeh, Monty A.
    Jayaratna, Isuru S.
    Hung, Andrew J.
    Pan, Michael M.
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Goh, Alvin C.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (11): : 3261 - 3266
  • [2] Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Khan, Reenam
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Lovegrove, Catherine
    Abaza, Ronny
    Ahlawat, Rajesh
    Ahlering, Thomas
    Ahlgren, Goran
    Artibani, Walter
    Barret, Eric
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Challacombe, Ben
    Coloby, Patrick
    Khan, Muhammad S.
    Hubert, Jacques
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Murphy, Declan
    Palou, Joan
    Patel, Vipul
    Piechaud, Pierre-Thierry
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Rischmann, Pascal
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Siemer, Stefan
    Stoeckle, Michael
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Terrier, Jean-Etienne
    Thueroff, Joachim W.
    Vaessen, Christophe
    Van der Poel, Henk G.
    Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
    Volpe, Alessandro
    Wagner, Christian
    Wiklund, Peter
    Wilson, Timothy
    Wirth, Manfred
    Witt, Joern
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [3] Development and content validation of a surgical safety checklist for operating theatres that use robotic technology
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Khan, Nuzhath
    Khan, Mohammed Shamim
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (07) : 1161 - 1174
  • [4] Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data
    Alemzadeh, Homa
    Raman, Jaishankar
    Leveson, Nancy
    Kalbarczyk, Zbigniew
    Iyer, Ravishankar K.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04):
  • [6] Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit
    Arain, Nabeel A.
    Dulan, Genevieve
    Hogg, Deborah C.
    Rege, Robert V.
    Powers, Cathryn E.
    Tesfay, Seifu T.
    Hynan, Linda S.
    Scott, Daniel J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (10): : 2740 - 2745
  • [7] Robotic radical prostatectomy: The vattikuti urology institute training experience
    Badani, KK
    Hemal, AK
    Peabody, JO
    Menon, M
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 24 (02) : 148 - 151
  • [8] Ballantyne GH, 2002, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V12, P17, DOI 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00003
  • [9] Robotically Assisted Thoracic Surgery Proposed Guidelines for Privileging and Credentialing
    Bhora, Faiz Y.
    Al-Ayoubi, Adnan M.
    Rehmani, Sadiq S.
    Forleiter, Craig M.
    Raad, Wissam N.
    Belsley, Scott G.
    [J]. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 11 (06) : 386 - 389
  • [10] Robot-assisted simulated cataract surgery
    Bourcier, Tristan
    Chammas, Jimmy
    Becmeur, Pierre-Henri
    Sauer, Arnaud
    Gaucher, David
    Liverneaux, Philippe
    Marescaux, Jacques
    Mutter, Didier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (04) : 552 - 557