Identifying psychosocial characteristics that predict outcome to the UPLIFT programme for people with persistent back pain: protocol for a prospective cohort study

被引:6
作者
Thomson, Hayley [1 ,2 ]
Evans, Kerrie [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Dearness, Jonathon [1 ]
Kelley, John [1 ]
Conway, Kylie [1 ]
Morris, Collette [1 ]
Bisset, Leanne [4 ,6 ]
Scholten-Peeters, Gwendolijne [7 ]
Cuijpers, Pim [8 ]
Coppieters, Michel W. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Gold Coast Hosp & Hlth Serv, Gold Coast, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Med Sci, Gold Coast, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Griffith Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Healthia Ltd, Allsports Physiotherapy & Sports Med Clin, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Hopkins Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prognosis; disability; rehabilitation; biopsychosocial; pain education; chronic pain; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; START BACK; DISABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; CARE; MANAGEMENT; BELIEFS; SCALES; SF-36;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028747
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Prognostic screening of people with low back pain (LBP) improves utilisation of primary healthcare resources. Whether this also applies to secondary healthcare remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to develop prognostic models to determine at baseline which patients with persistent LBP are likely to have a good and poor outcome to a 5-week programme of combined education and exercise ('UPLIFT') delivered in a secondary healthcare setting. Methods and analysis A prospective cohort study of 246 people with persistent LBP will be conducted in a secondary healthcare outpatient setting. Patients will be recruited from a physiotherapy-led neurosurgical screening clinic. Demographic data, medical history and psychosocial characteristics will be recorded at baseline. Fear avoidance beliefs, pain self-efficacy, LBP treatment beliefs, pain catastrophising, perceived injustice, depression, anxiety and stress, disability level, pain intensity and interference, health status and social connectedness will be considered as potential prognostic variables, which will be assessed using self-reported questionnaires. Participants will attend the UPLIFT programme, consisting of weekly 90min group sessions that combine interactive education sessions and a graded exercise programme. The outcome measure to identify good and poor outcome is the Global Rating of Change scale, assessed at completion of the UPLIFT programme and at 6 months follow-up. Multiple imputation analyses will be performed for missing values. Prognostic models will be developed using multivariable logistic regression analyses, with bootstrapping techniques for internal validation. We will calculate the explained variance of the models and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Furthermore, we will determine whether participation in the UPLIFT programme is associated with changes in psychosocial characteristics. Ethics and dissemination Gold Coast Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/QGC/41) and the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (GU Ref No: 2018/408) approved the study. Dissemination of findings will occur via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Trial registration number ACTRN12618001525279.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]   Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and Future [J].
Moseley, G. Lorimer ;
Butler, David S. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (09) :807-813
[32]  
Moseley L.G., 2017, Explain Pain Supercharged
[33]  
Moseley LG, 2007, PAINFUL YARNS METAPH
[34]   The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account [J].
Nicholas, Michael K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 11 (02) :153-163
[35]  
Norton K., 2011, PRE-EXERCISE SCREENING, Guide to the Australian adult pre-exercise screening system
[36]   Unraveling the Complexity of Low Back Pain [J].
O'Sullivan, Peter ;
Caneiro, Joao Paulo ;
O'Keeffe, Mary ;
O'Sullivan, Kieran .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 46 (11) :932-937
[37]   Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the pain catastrophizing scale [J].
Osman, A ;
Barrios, FX ;
Kopper, BA ;
Hauptmann, W ;
Jones, J ;
O'Neill, E .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1997, 20 (06) :589-605
[38]   The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Further psychometric evaluation with adult samples [J].
Osman, A ;
Barrios, FX ;
Gutierrez, PM ;
Kopper, BA ;
Merrifield, T ;
Grittmann, L .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2000, 23 (04) :351-365
[39]   Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians [J].
Qaseem, Amir ;
Wilt, Timothy J. ;
McLean, Robert M. ;
Forciea, Mary Ann .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 166 (07) :514-U142
[40]   Evaluation of an advanced-practice physiotherapist in triaging patients with lumbar spine pain: surgeon-physiotherapist level of agreement and patient satisfaction [J].
Robarts, Susan ;
Stratford, Paul ;
Kennedy, Deborah ;
Malcolm, Barry ;
Finkelstein, Joel .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 60 (04) :266-272