Market Valuation of Intangible Asset: Evidence on SG&A Expenditure

被引:37
|
作者
Banker, Rajiv D. [1 ]
Huang, Rong [2 ]
Natarajan, Ram [3 ]
Zhao, Sha [4 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[4] Oakland Univ, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
来源
ACCOUNTING REVIEW | 2019年 / 94卷 / 06期
关键词
SG&A expenditure; intangible asset; market valuation; analyst forecast; FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS; DELISTING BIAS; CROSS-SECTION; COST BEHAVIOR; EARNINGS; RETURNS; INFORMATION; ANALYSTS; PERFORMANCE; AMORTIZATION;
D O I
10.2308/accr-52468
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate the stock market valuation of the intangible asset created by selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenditure. Although GAAP requires immediate expensing of SG&A, prior studies show that current SG&A generates future economic benefits, suggesting that it creates an intangible asset. We find that the contemporaneous stock market seems to recognize some of the intangible asset value implicit in SG&A. Positive subsequent returns can be earned in firms with a high SG&A intangible asset value. These excess returns are more likely due to investor mispricing than to risk compensation. Furthermore, we find that both analysts' long-term growth forecast revisions and one-year-ahead forecast errors are positively associated with the future value created by current SG&A, indicating that analysts partially incorporate the intangible SG&A asset value into their forecasts. Overall, the evidence suggests that the capital market only partially recognizes the intangible asset value created by SG&A expenditure.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 90
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The implication of unrecognized asset value on the relation between market valuation and debt valuation adjustment
    Matthew C. Cedergren
    Changling Chen
    Kai Chen
    Review of Accounting Studies, 2019, 24 : 426 - 455
  • [12] Market Development and the Asset Growth Effect: International Evidence
    Titman, Sheridan
    Wei, K. C. John
    Xie, Feixue
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2013, 48 (05) : 1405 - 1432
  • [13] New evidence on the impact of implicit trading costs on asset prices in the Russian stock market
    Teplova, Tamara
    Gurov, Sergei
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (51) : 5943 - 5955
  • [14] Investor sentiment, asset returns and firm characteristics: Evidence from the Korean Stock Market
    Yang, Heejin
    Ryu, Doojin
    Ryu, Doowon
    INVESTMENT ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2017, 46 (02) : 132 - 147
  • [15] Empirical evidence of conditional asset pricing in the Indian stock market
    Das, Sudipta
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2015, 39 (02) : 225 - 239
  • [16] R&D sensitivity to asset sale proceeds: New evidence on financing constraints and intangible investment
    Borisova, Ginka
    Brown, James R.
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (01) : 159 - 173
  • [17] Liquidity and asset pricing: Evidence from the Hong Kong stock market
    Lam, Keith S. K.
    Tam, Lewis H. K.
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (09) : 2217 - 2230
  • [18] Determinants and market valuation of the decision to audit or review: Evidence from Taiwan
    Lin, Hsiao-Lun
    Yen, Ai-Ru
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2017, 13 (03) : 209 - 224
  • [19] Does data asset disclosure contribute to the market efficiency? Evidence from China
    Wei, Yanlin
    Zhang, Junrui
    Cheng, Maoyong
    Liu, Tingting
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2025, 73
  • [20] Does corporate hedging affect firm valuation? Evidence from the IPO market
    Qiao, Zheng
    Xia, Chongwu
    Zhang, Lei
    JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2020, 40 (06) : 895 - 927