Breast cancer patient perspective on opportunities and challenges of a genetic test aimed to predict radio-induced side effects before treatment: Analysis of the Italian branch of the REQUITE project

被引:18
作者
Bellardita, Lara [1 ]
Colciago, Riccardo Ray [2 ]
Frasca, Sarah [3 ]
De Santis, Maria Carmen [3 ]
Gay, Simona [1 ]
Palorini, Federica [1 ]
La Rocca, Eliana [3 ,4 ]
Valdagni, Riccardo [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rancati, Tiziana [1 ]
Lozza, Laura [3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Prostate Canc Program, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Radiotherapy, Milan, Italy
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Radiat Oncol 1, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematooncol, Milan, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2021年 / 126卷 / 10期
关键词
Genetic test; Radiotherapy toxicity; Breast cancer; Semi-structured interviews; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONSERVING SURGERY; RADIOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATION; TOXICITY; RISK; RADIATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-021-01395-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim To explore breast cancer patient's perspective on future genetic testing for prediction of toxicity after breast radiotherapy (RT). Materials and methods The study involved patient enrolled in the Italian branch of the REQUITE project conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Milan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted within one month from the end of radiotherapy treatment by two radiation oncologists and a radiotherapy technician previously trained by a clinical psychologist with experience in the oncology field. Semi-structured interviews are characterized by a set of pre-defined questions and developed ad hoc by researchers in Leicester within the REQUITE project. The interview questions investigated interest in undergoing the genetic test and expectations on its usefulness and disadvantages. Results Eighteen interviews were conducted and analysed. Forty-five initial codes were combined into nine themes which were then clustered in two main macro-areas (i) Opportunities and (ii) Challenges. Overall, all patients understand the aim of the genetic test and considered its intrinsic opportunity to make the physician more confident with the treatment. Regarding side effects, most of patients felt prepared to RT but not without fear. Many women considered important to have the largest and reliable information, also about negative experiences. Prevailing emotions were anxiety and fear but not connected to genetic test's result. Conclusions A genetic test could be an opportunity because generate knowledge and give patients a dynamic role in the decision-making approach. Prediction of single patient radiosensitivity before RT could prompt suggestion to entail a more and more tailored radiation treatment in the era of personalized approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1366 / 1373
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   STROGAR - STrengthening the Reporting Of Genetic Association studies in Radiogenomics [J].
Kerns, Sarah L. ;
de Ruysscher, Dirk ;
Andreassen, Christian N. ;
Azria, David ;
Barnett, Gillian C. ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Davidson, Susan ;
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Dunning, Alison M. ;
Ostrer, Harry ;
Rosenstein, Barry S. ;
West, Catharine M. L. ;
Bentzen, Soren M. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (01) :182-188
[12]   The European Cancer Patient's Bill of Rights, update and implementation 2016 [J].
Lawler, Mark ;
Banks, Ian ;
Law, Kate ;
Albreht, Tit ;
Armand, Jean-Pierre ;
Barbacid, Mariano ;
Barzach, Michele ;
Bergh, Jonas ;
Cameron, David ;
Conte, Pierfranco ;
de Braud, Filippo ;
de Gramont, Aimery ;
de Lorenzo, Francesco ;
Diehl, Volker ;
Diler, Sarper ;
Erdem, Sema ;
Geissler, Jan ;
Gore-Booth, Jola ;
Henning, Geoffrey ;
Hojgaard, Liselotte ;
Horgan, Denis ;
Jassem, Jacek ;
Johnson, Peter ;
Kaasa, Stein ;
Kapitein, Peter ;
Karjalainen, Sakari ;
Kelly, Joan ;
Kienesberger, Anita ;
La Vecchia, Carlo ;
Lacombe, Denis ;
Lindahl, Tomas ;
Loewenberg, Bob ;
Luzzatto, Lucio ;
Malby, Rebecca ;
Mastris, Ken ;
Meunier, Francoise ;
Murphy, Martin ;
Naredi, Peter ;
Nurse, Paul ;
Oliver, Kathy ;
Pearce, Jonathan ;
Pelouchov, Jana ;
Piccart, Martine ;
Pinedo, Bob ;
Spurrier-Bernard, Gilly ;
Sullivan, Richard ;
Tabernero, Josep ;
Van de Velde, Cornelis ;
Van Herk, Bert ;
Vedsted, Peter .
ESMO OPEN, 2016, 1 (06)
[13]   Empowering patients in decision-making in radiation oncology - can we do better? [J].
Leech, Michelle ;
Katz, Matthew S. ;
Kazmierska, Joanna ;
McCrossin, Julie ;
Turner, Sandra .
MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2020, 14 (07) :1442-1460
[14]  
Livi L, 2011, RADIOL MED, V116, P1050, DOI 10.1007/s11547-011-0652-2
[15]  
Maiello E, 2017, PROCESSI DECISIONALI
[16]  
Manchikanti L, 2011, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V14, pE35
[17]   Quality of life in active surveillance and the associations with decision-making-a literature review [J].
Menichetti, Julia ;
Valdagni, Riccardo ;
Bellardita, Lara .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) :160-169
[18]   Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following forward planned field-in field IMRT: Results from the Cambridge Breast IMRT trial [J].
Mukesh, Mukesh B. ;
Qian, Wendi ;
Wilkinson, Jennifer S. ;
Dorling, Leila ;
Barnett, Gillian C. ;
Moody, Anne M. ;
Wilson, Charles ;
Twyman, Nicola ;
Burnet, Neil G. ;
Wishart, Gordon C. ;
Coles, Charlotte E. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 (02) :270-275
[19]   Factors influencing a woman's choice to undergo breast conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy [J].
Nold, RJ ;
Beamer, RL ;
Helmer, SD ;
McBoyle, MF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 180 (06) :413-418
[20]   Inclusion of clinical risk factors into NTCP modelling of late rectal toxicity after high dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Rancati, Tiziana ;
Fiorino, Claudio ;
Fellin, Gianni ;
Vavassori, Vittorio ;
Cagna, Emanuela ;
Borca, Valeria Casanova ;
Girelli, Giuseppe ;
Menegotti, Loris ;
Monti, Angelo Filippo ;
Tortoreto, Francesca ;
Delle Canne, Stefania ;
Valdagni, Riccardo .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 100 (01) :124-130