Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches

被引:105
作者
Janssen, Jeroen [1 ]
Kirschner, Femke [2 ]
Erkens, Gijsbert [1 ]
Kirschner, Paul A. [3 ]
Paas, Fred [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Res Ctr Learning Interact, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Inst Psychol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Open Univ Netherlands, Ctr Learning Sci & Technol, NL-6401 DL Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Collaborative learning; Cognitive load theory; Process-oriented research; Group member interaction; Cognitive load measurement; RESOURCE INTERDEPENDENCE; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; MEMBER FAMILIARITY; GROUPS PERFORM; WORK; TASK; CONSEQUENCES; ACHIEVEMENT; EFFICIENCY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Traditional research on collaborative learning employs a "black box" approach that makes it difficult to gain a deeper understanding of the differential effects of collaborative learning. To make the black box transparent, researchers have studied the process of collaboration, in order to establish which interaction features are likely to make learning more effective and efficient for group members. Although cognitive load theory has been developed in the context of individual learning situations, it may provide a promising new way of looking inside the black box, assuming that students working in groups have more processing capacity than students working individually. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the process-oriented and cognitive-load approaches to conducting collaborative learning research, to highlight their respective advantages and disadvantages, and to suggest how they can be combined in order to address new research questions.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 154
页数:16
相关论文
共 105 条
[11]   Is a partner's competence threatening during dyadic cooperative work? It depends on resource interdependence [J].
Buchs, Celine ;
Butera, Fabrizio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2009, 24 (02) :145-154
[12]  
CIBORRA C, 1988, P 1988 ACM C COMP SU
[13]   RESTRUCTURING THE CLASSROOM - CONDITIONS FOR PRODUCTIVE SMALL-GROUPS [J].
COHEN, EG .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 64 (01) :1-35
[15]   Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts [J].
de Jong, F ;
Kollöffel, B ;
van der Meijden, H ;
Staarman, JK ;
Janssen, J .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2005, 21 (04) :645-670
[16]   Dyad composition effects on cognitive elaboration and student achievement [J].
Denessen, Eddie ;
Veenman, Simon ;
Dobbelsteen, Janine ;
Van Schilt, Josie .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2008, 76 (04) :363-383
[17]  
Dillenbourg, 1999, COLLABORATIVE LEARNI, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00011-7
[18]  
Dillenbourg P., 1996, Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, P189, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-71, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1]
[19]   Collaborative learning and the construction of common knowledge [J].
Elbers, E ;
Streefland, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2000, 15 (04) :479-490
[20]   Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing [J].
Erkens, G ;
Jaspers, J ;
Prangsma, M ;
Kanselaar, G .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2005, 21 (03) :463-486