Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches

被引:105
作者
Janssen, Jeroen [1 ]
Kirschner, Femke [2 ]
Erkens, Gijsbert [1 ]
Kirschner, Paul A. [3 ]
Paas, Fred [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Res Ctr Learning Interact, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Inst Psychol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Open Univ Netherlands, Ctr Learning Sci & Technol, NL-6401 DL Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Collaborative learning; Cognitive load theory; Process-oriented research; Group member interaction; Cognitive load measurement; RESOURCE INTERDEPENDENCE; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; MEMBER FAMILIARITY; GROUPS PERFORM; WORK; TASK; CONSEQUENCES; ACHIEVEMENT; EFFICIENCY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Traditional research on collaborative learning employs a "black box" approach that makes it difficult to gain a deeper understanding of the differential effects of collaborative learning. To make the black box transparent, researchers have studied the process of collaboration, in order to establish which interaction features are likely to make learning more effective and efficient for group members. Although cognitive load theory has been developed in the context of individual learning situations, it may provide a promising new way of looking inside the black box, assuming that students working in groups have more processing capacity than students working individually. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the process-oriented and cognitive-load approaches to conducting collaborative learning research, to highlight their respective advantages and disadvantages, and to suggest how they can be combined in order to address new research questions.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 154
页数:16
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   Communication medium and member familiarity: The effects on decision time, accuracy, and satisfaction [J].
Adams, SJ ;
Roch, SG ;
Ayman, R .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (03) :321-353
[2]   RECALL SUFFERS FROM COLLABORATION - JOINT RECALL EFFECTS OF FRIENDSHIP AND TASK COMPLEXITY [J].
ANDERSSON, J ;
RONNBERG, J .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 9 (03) :199-211
[3]  
[Anonymous], EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1177/147470490600400135
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Educational technology
[5]  
[Anonymous], 3 INT COGN LOAD THEO
[6]  
Artzt A.F., 1997, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, V16, P63, DOI [10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90008-0, DOI 10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90008-0]
[7]  
Baddeley A. D., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[8]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359
[9]  
Bernard R.M., 2001, EDUC RES EVAL, V7, P241, DOI DOI 10.1076/EDRE.7.2.241.3866
[10]   COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES IN THE CLASSROOM [J].
BOSSERT, ST .
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 1988, 15 :225-250