The Incremental Validity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:148
作者
Andrei, Federica [1 ]
Siegling, A. B. [2 ]
Aloe, Ariel M. [3 ]
Baldaro, Bruno [1 ]
Petrides, K. V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Psychol, Viale Berti Pichat 5, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
[2] UCL, London Psychometr Lab, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol & Quantitat Fdn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
BIG; 5; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; NEGATIVE AFFECT; ASSOCIATIONS; ABILITY; STRESS; BIAS; EXPLORATION; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1080/00223891.2015.1084630
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A criticism leveled against the conceptualization of emotional intelligence (EI) as a personality trait is that it overlaps considerably with the higher order personality dimensions and, therefore, has weak utility. To investigate this criticism, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to synthesize the literature examining the incremental validity of the 2 adult self-report forms of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). Twenty-four articles reporting 114 incremental validity analyses of the TEIQue were reviewed according to the studies' methodological features. Additionally, data from 18 studies (providing 105 effect sizes) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Results suggest that the TEIQue consistently explains incremental variance in criteria pertaining to different areas of functioning, beyond higher order personality dimensions and other emotion-related variables. The pooled effect size was relatively small, but statistically and practically significant (R-2 = .06, SE = .0116; 95% CI [.03, .08]). The number of covariates controlled for, the form of the TEIQue, and the focus on higher order personality dimensions versus other individual-difference constructs as baseline predictors did not affect the effect size. Analyses conducted at the factor level indicated that the incremental contribution is mainly due to the well-being and self-control factors of trait EI. Methodological issues and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 276
页数:16
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits [J].
Ackerman, PL ;
Heggestad, ED .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (02) :219-245
[2]   Asymptotic confidence limits for the difference between two squared multiple correlations: A simplified approach [J].
Alf, EF ;
Graf, RG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 4 (01) :70-75
[3]   An alternative to R2 for assessing linear models of effect size [J].
Aloe, Ariel M. ;
Becker, Betsy Jane ;
Pigott, Therese D. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (3-4) :272-283
[4]   An Effect Size for Regression Predictors in Meta-Analysis [J].
Aloe, Ariel M. ;
Becker, Betsy Jane .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2012, 37 (02) :278-297
[5]   The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire: Internal Structure, Convergent, Criterion, and Incremental Validity in an Italian Sample [J].
Andrei, Federica ;
Smith, Martin M. ;
Surcinelli, Paola ;
Baldaro, Bruno ;
Saklofske, Donald H. .
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 49 (01) :34-45
[6]   Testing the incremental validity of Trait Emotional Intelligence: Evidence from an Italian sample of adolescents [J].
Andrei, Federica ;
Mancini, Giacomo ;
Trombini, Elena ;
Baldaro, Bruno ;
Russo, P. M. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 64 :24-29
[7]   Trait emotional intelligence and somatic complaints with reference to positive and negative mood [J].
Andrei, Federica ;
Petrides, K. V. .
PSIHOLOGIJA, 2013, 46 (01) :5-15
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1997, TORONTO CANADA MULTI, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NDTEINT.2009.11.003
[10]  
Antonakis J., 2004, Organizational Analysis, V12, P171, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB028991