Stable inverse probability weighting estimation for longitudinal studies

被引:19
作者
Avagyan, Vahe [1 ]
Vansteelandt, Stijn [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Biometris Math & Stat Methods Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Appl Math Comp Sci & Stat, Ghent, Belgium
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London, England
关键词
calibration estimation; covariate balancing; inverse probability weighting; propensity score; DEMYSTIFYING DOUBLE ROBUSTNESS; PROPENSITY SCORE; CAUSAL INFERENCE; ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES; CALIBRATION ESTIMATORS; ASSOCIATION; NONRESPONSE; EFFICIENCY; FRAMEWORK; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/sjos.12542
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
We consider estimation of the average effect of time-varying dichotomous exposure on outcome using inverse probability weighting (IPW) under the assumption that there is no unmeasured confounding of the exposure-outcome association at each time point. Despite the popularity of IPW, its performance is often poor due to instability of the estimated weights. We develop an estimating equation-based strategy for the nuisance parameters indexing the weights at each time point, aimed at preventing highly volatile weights and ensuring the stability of IPW estimation. Our proposed approach targets the estimation of the counterfactual mean under a chosen treatment regime and requires fitting a separate propensity score model at each time point. We discuss and examine extensions to enable the fitting of marginal structural models using one propensity score model across all time points. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate adequate performance of our approach compared with the maximum likelihood propensity score estimator and the covariate balancing propensity score estimator.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1067
页数:22
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MARGINAL STRUCTURAL
[2]   Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido W. ;
Wager, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2018, 80 (04) :597-623
[3]   A Framework for Dynamic Causal Inference in Political Science [J].
Blackwell, Matthew .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 57 (02) :504-520
[4]   Globally efficient non-parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting [J].
Chan, Kwun Chuen Gary ;
Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip ;
Zhang, Zheng .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2016, 78 (03) :673-700
[5]   CALIBRATION ESTIMATORS IN SURVEY SAMPLING [J].
DEVILLE, JC ;
SARNDAL, CE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 87 (418) :376-382
[6]  
Fan Jianqing, 2016, MIMEO
[7]   COVARIATE BALANCING PROPENSITY SCORE FOR A CONTINUOUS TREATMENT: APPLICATION TO THE EFFICACY OF POLITICAL ADVERTISEMENTS [J].
Fong, Christian ;
Hazlett, Chad ;
Imai, Kosuke .
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 12 (01) :156-177
[8]   Penalized regressions: The bridge versus the lasso [J].
Fu, WJJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (03) :397-416
[9]   Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies [J].
Hainmueller, Jens .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (01) :25-46
[10]   Intrinsic efficiency and multiple robustness in longitudinal studies with drop-out [J].
Han, Peisong .
BIOMETRIKA, 2016, 103 (03) :683-700