Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review

被引:414
作者
Christensen, Hans B. [1 ]
Hail, Luzi [2 ]
Leuz, Christian [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Transparency; Regulation; SASB; GRI; Standard setting; Accounting standards; Mandatory disclosure; Environmental; social and governance issues (ESG); CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; GLOBAL ACCOUNTING CONVERGENCE; CAPITAL-MARKET EQUILIBRIUM; SARBANES-OXLEY ACT; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURES; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; FIRM PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study collates potential economic effects of mandated disclosure and reporting standards for corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability topics. We first outline key features of CSR reporting. Next, we draw on relevant academic literatures in accounting, finance, economics, and management to discuss and evaluate the potential economic consequences of a requirement for CSR and sustainability reporting for U.S. firms, including effects in capital markets, on stakeholders other than investors, and on firm behavior. We also discuss issues related to the implementation and enforcement of CSR and sustainability reporting standards as well as two approaches to sustainability reporting that differ in their overarching goals and materiality standards. Our analysis yields a number of insights that are relevant for the current debate on mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting. It also points scholars to avenues for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1176 / 1248
页数:73
相关论文
共 393 条
  • [1] Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices The case of King III in South Africa
    Ackers, Barry
    Eccles, Neil Stuart
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2015, 28 (04): : 515 - 550
  • [2] Adams C.A., 2007, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V20, P333, DOI [10.1108/09513570710748535, DOI 10.1108/09513570710748535, DOI 10.1108/09513570710748553]
  • [3] Forcing firms to talk: Financial disclosure regulation and externalities
    Admati, AR
    Pfleiderer, P
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2000, 13 (03) : 479 - 519
  • [4] Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication
    Aerts, Walter
    Cormier, Denis
    [J]. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2009, 34 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [5] Resiliency of Environmental and Social Stocks: An Analysis of the Exogenous COVID-19 Market Crash
    Albuquerque, Rui
    Koskinen, Yrjo
    Yang, Shuai
    Zhang, Chendi
    [J]. REVIEW OF CORPORATE FINANCE STUDIES, 2020, 9 (03) : 593 - 621
  • [6] Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence
    Albuquerque, Rui
    Koskinen, Yrjo
    Zhang, Chendi
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) : 4451 - 4469
  • [7] Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey
    Amel-Zadeh, Amir
    Serafeim, George
    [J]. FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2018, 74 (03) : 87 - 103
  • [8] ASSET PRICING AND THE BID ASK SPREAD
    AMIHUD, Y
    MENDELSON, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) : 223 - 249
  • [9] Amiraslani H., 2021, TRUST SOCIAL CAPITAL
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2013, The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013