ECOLOGICAL MODELS AND PESTICIDE RISK ASSESSMENT: CURRENT MODELING PRACTICE

被引:93
作者
Schmolke, Amelie [1 ]
Thorbek, Pernille [2 ]
Chapman, Peter [2 ]
Grimm, Volker [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Ecol Modelling, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Jealotts Hill Int Res Ctr, Bracknell RG42 6EY, Berks, England
关键词
Ecological modeling; Pesticide risk assessment; Population-level effects; Toxicity; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; MANAGEMENT; WILDLIFE; EXTRAPOLATION; CHEMICALS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/etc.120
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological risk assessments of pesticides usually focus on risk at the level of individuals, and are carried out by comparing exposure and toxicological endpoints. However, in most cases the protection goal is populations rather than individuals. On the population level, effects of pesticides depend not only on exposure and toxicity, but also on factors such as life history characteristics, population structure, timing of application, presence of refuges in time and space, and landscape structure. Ecological models can integrate such factors and have the potential to become important tools for the prediction of population-level effects of exposure to pesticides, thus allowing extrapolations, for example, from laboratory to field. Indeed, a broad range of ecological models have been applied to chemical risk assessment in the scientific literature, but so far such models have only rarely been used to support regulatory risk assessments of pesticides. To better understand the reasons for this situation, the current modeling practice in this field was assessed in the present study. The scientific literature was searched for relevant models and assessed according to nine characteristics: model type, model complexity, toxicity measure, exposure pattern, other factors, taxonomic group, risk assessment endpoint, parameterization, and model evaluation. The present study found that, although most models were of a high scientific standard, many of them would need modification before they are suitable for regulatory risk assessments. The main shortcomings of currently available models in the context of regulatory pesticide risk assessments were identified. When ecological models are applied to regulatory risk assessments, we recommend reviewing these models according to the nine characteristics evaluated here. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010;29:1006-1012. (C) 2010 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1012
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL MODELS RE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, European Commission regulation 473/2002 amending Annexes I, II and VI to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs, and laying down detailed
[3]   Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models [J].
Awkerman, Jill A. ;
Raimondo, Sandy ;
Barron, Mace G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (09) :3447-3452
[4]   Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment [J].
Barnthouse, LW .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 23 (02) :500-508
[6]   Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using a diquat dibromide case study III. Ecological process models [J].
Bartell, SM ;
Campbell, KR ;
Lovelock, CM ;
Nair, SK ;
Shaw, JL .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2000, 19 (05) :1441-1453
[7]   On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management [J].
Beissinger, SR ;
Westphal, MI .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1998, 62 (03) :821-841
[8]   Simulating the dynamics of sulfur species and zinc in wetland sediments [J].
Choi, Jung Hyun ;
Park, Seok Soon ;
Jaffe, Peter R. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 199 (03) :315-323
[9]   Construction and evaluation of ALOMYSYS modelling the effects of cropping systems on the blackgrass life-cycle: From seedling to seed production [J].
Colbach, N. ;
Chauvel, B. ;
Gauvrit, C. ;
Munier-Jolain, N. M. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 201 (3-4) :283-300
[10]  
European Commission, 2002, SANCO32682001 EUR CO