ORAL 5-DAY LEFAMULIN FOR OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA: POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF THE LEFAMULIN EVALUATION AGAINST PNEUMONIA (LEAP) 2 TRIAL

被引:2
作者
LoVecchio, Frank [1 ]
Schranz, Jennifer [2 ]
Alexander, Elizabeth [2 ]
Mariano, David [2 ]
Meads, Andrew [2 ]
Sandrock, Christian [3 ]
Moran, Gregory J. [4 ]
Giordano, Philip A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Valleywise Med Ctr, ASU, U AZ, 1012 Willetta St,Floor 2, Phoenix, AZ 85006 USA
[2] Nabriva Therapeut Us Inc, King Of Prussia, PA USA
[3] UC Davis Sch Med, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Olive View UCLA Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Orlando Reg Med Ctr Inc, Dept Emergency Med, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
community-acquired bacterial pneumonia; efficacy; lefamulin; moxifloxacin; outpatients; INFECTIOUS-DISEASES-SOCIETY; HEALTH-CARE EPIDEMIOLOGY; THORACIC-SOCIETY; RISK; GUIDELINES; AMERICA; PROGRAM; STEWARDSHIP; DIAGNOSIS; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.02.001
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Safe and effective oral antibiotics are needed for outpatient management of moderate to severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Objective: We describe a post-hoc analysis of adults with CABP managed as outpatients from the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) 2 double-blind, noninferiority, phase 3 clinical trial. Methods: LEAP 2 compared the efficacy and safety of oral lefamulin 600 mg every 12 h (5 days) vs. oral moxifloxacin 400 mg every 24 h (7 days) in adults (inpatients and outpatients) with Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk classes II.IV. Results: Overall, 41% (151 of 368) of patients receiving lefamulin and 43% (159 of 368) of patients receiving moxifloxacin started treatment as outpatients- 44% and 40%, respectively, were PORT risk class III/IV, and 21% in both groups had CURB-65 scores of 2.3. Early clinical response (at 96 +/- 24 h) and investigator assessment of clinical response success rates at test of cure (5.10 days after last study drug dose) were high and similar in both groups among all (lefamulin, 91% vs. moxifloxacin, 89.90%), PORTrisk class III/ IV (89.91% vs. 88.91%), and CURB-65 score 2.3 (87.90% vs. 82.88%) outpatients. Few outpatients (lefamulin, 2.6%; moxifloxacin, 2.5%) discontinued the study drug because of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No outpatient in the lefamulin group was hospitalized for a TEAE, compared with 5 patients (3%), including two deaths, in the moxifloxacin group. Conclusions: These data suggest that 5 days of oral lefamulin can be given in lieu of fluoroquinolones for outpatient treatment of adults with CABP and PORT risk class III/IV or CURB-65 scores of 2.3. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 792
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Oral Lefamulin vs Moxifloxacin for Early Clinical Response Among Adults With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: The LEAP 2 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Alexander, Elizabeth ;
Goldberg, Lisa ;
Das, Anita F. ;
Moran, Gregory J. ;
Sandrock, Christian ;
Gasink, Leanne B. ;
Spera, Patricia ;
Sweeney, Carolyn ;
Paukner, Susanne ;
Wicha, Wolfgang W. ;
Gelone, Steven P. ;
Schranz, Jennifer .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (17) :1661-1671
[2]   Hospital Admission Decision for Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia [J].
Aliberti, Stefano ;
Faverio, Paola ;
Blasi, Francesco .
CURRENT INFECTIOUS DISEASE REPORTS, 2013, 15 (02) :167-176
[3]   Reasons Why Emergency Department Providers Do Not Rely on the Pneumonia Severity Index to Determine the Initial Site of Treatment for Patients with Pneumonia [J].
Aujesky, Drahomir ;
McCausland, Julie B. ;
Whittle, Jeff ;
Obrosky, D. Scott ;
Yealy, Donald M. ;
Fine, Michael J. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 49 (10) :E100-E108
[4]  
Barlam TF, 2016, CLIN INFECT DIS, V62, pE51, DOI 10.1093/cid/ciw118
[5]   Geographic Shifts in Antibacterial Drug Clinical Trial Enrollment: Implications for Generalizability [J].
Bart, Stephen M. ;
Farley, John J. ;
Bala, Shukal ;
Amini, Thushi ;
Cox, Edward .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 72 (08) :1422-1428
[6]   High-Cost, High-Need Patients: The Impact of Reported Penicillin Allergy [J].
Blumenthal, Kimberly G. ;
Oreskovic, Nicolas M. ;
Fu, Xiaoqing ;
Shebl, Fatma M. ;
Mancini, Christian M. ;
Maniates, Jennifer M. ;
Walensky, Rochelle P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2020, 26 (04) :154-+
[7]   The relative burden of community-acquired pneumonia hospitalizations in older adults: a retrospective observational study in the United States [J].
Brown, Joshua D. ;
Harnett, James ;
Chambers, Richard ;
Sato, Reiko .
BMC GERIATRICS, 2018, 18
[8]   Outpatient care compared with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia -: A randomized trial in low-risk patients [J].
Carratalà, J ;
Fernández-Sabé, N ;
Ortega, L ;
Castellsagué, X ;
Rosón, B ;
Dorca, J ;
Fernández-Agüera, A ;
Verdaguer, R ;
Martínez, J ;
Manresa, F ;
Gudiol, F .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (03) :165-172
[9]   Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship [J].
Dellit, Timothy H. ;
Owens, Robert C. ;
McGowan, John E., Jr. ;
Gerding, Dale N. ;
Weinstein, Robert A. ;
Burke, John P. ;
Huskins, W. Charles ;
Paterson, David L. ;
Fishman, Neil O. ;
Carpenter, Christopher F. ;
Brennan, P. J. ;
Billeter, Marianne ;
Hooton, Thomas M. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 44 (02) :159-177
[10]   The 1-year economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) initially managed in the outpatient setting in the USA [J].
Divino, Victoria ;
Schranz, Jennifer ;
Early, Maureen ;
Shah, Hemal ;
Jiang, Miao ;
DeKoven, Mitch .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (02) :127-140