Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy

被引:106
作者
Brusciano, L
Ayabaca, SM
Pescatori, M
Accarpio, GM
Dodi, G
Cavallari, F
Ravo, B
Annibali, R
机构
[1] Villa Flamina Hosp, Coloproctol Univ, I-00191 Rome, Italy
[2] Villa Scassi Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp, Coloproctol Unit, Padua, Italy
[4] Amer Hosp, Dept Surg, Rome, Italy
[5] S Pio 10th Hosp, Coloproctol Unit, Milan, Italy
关键词
hemorrhoids; stapled hemorrhoidopexy; postoperative complications; reintervention;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-004-0721-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has become increasingly popular over the past five years, mainly because of the assumption that it is associated with less pain. However, persistent tags and recurrence might represent a problem, because piles are not excised and severe complications requiring surgery have been occasionally reported. The aim of the present study is to analyze the causes for and the outcome of reintervention following either severely complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. METHODS: A total of 232 primary stapled hemorrhoidopexies and 65 reinterventions after stapled hemorrhoidopexy were performed by the authors in five centers devoted to colorectal surgery. Twelve patients of the latter group had the stapled hemorrhoidopexy performed in one of these centers. Thirty-five were males and 30 were females. The mean age was 50 (range, 29-81) years. In all cases the primary indication for stapled hemorrhoidopexy was either third-degree or fourth-degree symptomatic hemorrhoids. In all patients submitted to reoperation the diagnosis of either severely complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy was made. The clinical history of all of these patients was carefully studied and all underwent inspection, digital exploration, and proctoscopy. After the reintervention, proctoscopy was performed in 61 patients (92 percent) after a median follow-up of 5.5 (range, 1-36) months. RESULTS: Our reoperation rate after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was 11 percent. The most frequent indications for reintervention were persistent, severe anal pain (visual analog pain score higher than 7) in 29 patients (45 percent), severe postoperative bleeding in 20 (31 percent), anal fissure in 16 (21 percent), prolapsing piles in 12 (18 percent), rectal polyp in 11 (16 percent), anorectal sepsis in 11 (16 percent), and fecal incontinence in 7 (11 percent). Thirteen different types of reintervention were needed. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy, removal of staples, and fissurectomy and/or internal sphincterotomy were the most frequent operation (n = 41). A decrease in anal pain, as measured by visual analog pain score, was observed one month after reintervention, compared with that measured preoperatively (from 5.6 +/- 3.6 to 3.0 +/- 2.9) (P < 0.001). Bleeding requiring treatment occurred in six cases (10 percent), anal stricture requiring dilation occurred in three (5 percent), and fecal incontinence in three (5 percent). Proctoscopy showed no recurrences in 52 cases (80 percent) after the reintervention. CONCLUSION: Pain and bleeding mostly caused by piles, fissures, and retained staples were the most frequent causes for reoperation after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Reintervention was associated with a high bleeding and soiling rate, but was effective in treating pain and other symptoms in the majority of patients. Because of the wide spectrum of different interventions required, a failed or complicated stapled hemorrhoidopexy might be better treated by an experienced colorectal surgeon.
引用
收藏
页码:1846 / 1851
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], TECH COLOPROCTOL
  • [2] Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy -: Is there any difference?
    Arbman, G
    Krook, H
    Haapaniemi, S
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (01) : 31 - 34
  • [3] Beattie, 2000, Colorectal Dis, V2, P137, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2000.00125.x
  • [4] Benefit of emergency haemorrhoidectomy: A comparison with results after elective operations
    Ceulemans, R
    Creve, U
    Van Hee, R
    Martens, C
    Wuyts, FL
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 166 (10) : 808 - 812
  • [5] A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up
    Cheetham, MJ
    Cohen, CRG
    Kamm, AA
    Phillips, RKS
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (04) : 491 - 497
  • [6] Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy
    Cheetham, MJ
    Mortensen, NJM
    Nystrom, PO
    Kamm, MA
    Phillips, RKS
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9231) : 730 - 733
  • [7] Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy
    Ganio, E
    Altomare, DF
    Gabrielli, F
    Milito, G
    Canuti, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (05) : 669 - 674
  • [8] Herold A, 2000, LANCET, V356, P2187, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67258-3
  • [9] Stapled hemorrhoidectomy - Cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months
    Ho, YH
    Cheong, WK
    Tsang, C
    Ho, J
    Eu, KW
    Tang, CL
    Seow-Choen, F
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (12) : 1666 - 1675
  • [10] Ligation-anopexy for treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease
    Hussein, AM
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (12) : 1887 - 1890