Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis

被引:111
作者
Facciorusso, Antonio [1 ]
Wani, Sachin [2 ]
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos [3 ]
Tziatzios, Georgios [3 ]
Cannizzaro, Renato [4 ]
Muscatiello, Nicola [1 ]
Singh, Siddharth [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Endoscopy Unit, Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Hepatogastroenterol Unit, Athens, Greece
[4] Ctr Riferimento Oncol Aviano CRO IRCCS, Oncol Gastroenterol Unit, Aviano, Italy
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Gastroenterol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
CORE BIOPSY NEEDLE; FINE-NEEDLE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; 22-GAUGE ASPIRATION; 25-GAUGE; 22G; LESIONS; DIAGNOSIS; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.009
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Variable diagnostic performance of sampling techniques during EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic masses based on needle type (FNA versus fine-needle biopsy [FNB]) and gauge (19-gauge vs 22-gauge vs 25-gauge) has been reported. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided techniques for sampling solid pancreatic masses. Methods: Through a systematic literature review to November 2018, we identified 27 randomized controlled trials (2711 patients) involving adults undergoing EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses that evaluated the diagnostic performance of FNA and FNB needles based on needle gauge. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were sample adequacy, histologic core procurement rate, and number of needle passes. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses and appraised the quality of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Results: In the network meta-analysis, no specific EUS-guided tissue sampling technique was superior, based on needle type (FNA vs FNB) or gauge (19-gauge vs 22-gauge vs 25-gauge) (low-quality evidence). Specifically, there was no difference between 25-gauge FNA versus 22-gauge FNA (relative risk [RR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.17) and 22-gauge FNB versus 22-gauge FNA (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89-1.18) needles for diagnostic accuracy, sample adequacy, and histologic core procurement. Findings were confirmed in sensitivity analysis restricted to studies with no rapid on-site cytologic evaluation and no use of the fanning technique. Conclusion: In a network meta-analysis, no specific EUS-guided tissue sampling technique was superior with regard to diagnostic accuracy, sample adequacy, or histologic procurement rate for solid pancreatic masses, with low confidence in estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions [J].
Alatawi, Abdullah ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Grabar, Sophie ;
Leblanc, Sarah ;
Chaussade, Stanislas ;
Terris, Benoit ;
Barret, Maximilien ;
Prat, Frederic .
UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 3 (04) :343-352
[2]   How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Bland, J. Martin .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[3]   Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions [J].
Bang, J. Y. ;
Magee, S. H. ;
Ramesh, J. ;
Trevino, J. M. ;
Varadarajulu, S. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 45 (06) :445-450
[4]   In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Kirtane, Sachin ;
Krall, Konrad ;
Navaneethan, Udayakumar ;
Hasan, Muhammad ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 31 (02) :197-202
[5]   Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Hebert-Magee, Shantel ;
Navaneethan, Udayakumar ;
Hasan, Muhammad K. ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) :1432-1438
[6]   EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Hebert-Magee, Shantel ;
Navaneethan, Udayakumar ;
Hasan, Muhammad K. ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
GUT, 2018, 67 (12) :2081-+
[7]   Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Navaneethan, Udayakumar ;
Hasan, Muhammad K. ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 16 (11) :1820-+
[8]   Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Hebert-Magee, Shantel ;
Trevino, Jessica ;
Ramesh, Jayapal ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 76 (02) :321-327
[9]   A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions [J].
Camellini, L. ;
Carlinfante, G. ;
Azzolini, F. ;
Iori, V. ;
Cavina, M. ;
Sereni, G. ;
Decembrino, F. ;
Gallo, C. ;
Tamagnini, I. ;
Valli, R. ;
Piana, S. ;
Campari, C. ;
Gardini, G. ;
Sassatelli, R. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (08) :709-715
[10]   A prospective randomized study comparing 25-G and 22-G needles of a new platform for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid masses [J].
Carrara, Silvia ;
Anderloni, Andrea ;
Jovani, Manol ;
Di Tommaso, Luca ;
Rahal, Daoud ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Ridola, Lorenzo ;
Federico, Davide ;
Loriga, Alessandra ;
Repici, Alessandro .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2016, 48 (01) :49-54