Randomized trial of a patient-centered decision aid for promoting informed decisions about lung cancer screening: Implementation of a PCORI study protocol and lessons learned

被引:13
作者
Lowenstein, Lisa M. [1 ]
Escoto, Kamisha H. [2 ]
Leal, Viola B. [1 ]
Bailey, Linda [3 ]
Bevers, Therese B. [4 ]
Cantor, Scott B. [1 ]
Cinciripini, Paul M. [5 ]
Jacobs, Lianne E. [1 ]
Esparza, Angelina [6 ]
Godoy, Myrna C. [7 ]
Housten, Ashley J. [1 ]
Lin, Heather [8 ]
Luckett, Pamela [9 ]
Munden, Reginald F. [10 ]
Rabius, Vance [5 ]
Volk, Robert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Dispar Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] North Amer Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Canc Prevent, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Behav Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Houston Hlth Dept, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[9] Informat & Qual Healthcare, Ridgeland, MS USA
[10] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC USA
关键词
Lung neoplasms; Decision making; Early detection of cancer; Patient reported outcome measures; Patient participation; Decision aids;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2018.07.007
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Purpose: We describe the methods, stakeholder engagement, and lessons learned from a study comparing a video decision aid to standard educational materials on lung cancer screening decisions. Methods: The study followed rigorous methodology standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The importance of patient-centeredness and patient/stakeholder engagement are reflected across the study's conceptualization, execution, interpretation, and dissemination efforts. Advisory groups of current and former smokers, quitline service providers, clinicians, and patient advocates were formed for the project. The study used both retrospective and prospective recruitment strategies. Randomization of patients occurred within state-based quitlines, with aggressive tracking of participants. We collected data at baseline and 1-week, 3-month and 6-months after receiving the intervention. The patient-centered outcomes included whether patients' receiving the decision aid a) felt better prepared to make a decision, b) felt more informed about the screening decision, c) had more clarity on their values regarding the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening, and d) were more knowledgeable about lung cancer screening than patients receiving the standard education materials. Exploratory outcomes included making an appointment with a health care provider to discuss screening, scheduling and completing lung cancer screening. Results: We have enrolled and randomized 516 quitline patients and learned many lessons about executing the trial based on significant patient and stakeholder engagement. Conclusions: Conducting patient-centered outcomes research requires new ways of thinking and continuously checking-in with patients/stakeholders. The engagement of quitline service providers and patient advisors has been key to successful recruitment and dissemination planning.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
    Aberle, Denise R.
    Adams, Amanda M.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Black, William C.
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Fagerstrom, Richard M.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    Sicks, JoRean D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) : 395 - 409
  • [2] Benefits and Harms of CT Screening for Lung Cancer A Systematic Review
    Bach, Peter B.
    Mirkin, Joshua N.
    Oliver, Thomas K.
    Azzoli, Christopher G.
    Berry, Donald A.
    Brawley, Otis W.
    Byers, Tim
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Gould, Michael K.
    Jett, James R.
    Sabichi, Anita L.
    Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
    Wood, Douglas E.
    Qaseem, Amir
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (22): : 2418 - 2429
  • [3] The National Lung Screening Trial: Overview and Study Design
    Gatsonis, Constantine A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 258 (01) : 243 - 253
  • [4] Lifestyle as risk factor for cancer: Evidence from human studies
    Khan, Naghma
    Afaq, Farrukh
    Mukhtar, Hasan
    [J]. CANCER LETTERS, 2010, 293 (02) : 133 - 143
  • [5] MISSING DATA IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES
    LAIRD, NM
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1988, 7 (1-2) : 305 - 315
  • [6] LIANG KY, 1986, BIOMETRIKA, V73, P13, DOI 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
  • [7] Lowenstein Lisa M, 2016, Prev Med Rep, V4, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.07.008
  • [8] Annual number of lung cancer deaths potentially avertable by screening in the United States
    Ma, Jiemin
    Ward, Elizabeth M.
    Smith, Robert
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    [J]. CANCER, 2013, 119 (07) : 1381 - 1385
  • [9] Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Moyer, Virginia A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (05) : 330 - +
  • [10] VALIDATION OF A DECISIONAL CONFLICT SCALE
    OCONNOR, AM
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (01) : 25 - 30