Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Co-Benefits: A Structured Review of Lifestyle-Related Climate Change Mitigation Strategies

被引:57
作者
Quam, Vivian G. M. [1 ,2 ]
Rocklov, Joacim [1 ]
Quam, Mikkel B. M. [1 ]
Lucas, Rebekah A. I. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med Epidemiol & Global Hlth, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
diet; active transport; co-benefits; climate change mitigation; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; MEAT CONSUMPTION; LAND-USE; DIET; IMPACT; ENERGY; FOOD; CAR; MORTALITY; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph14050468
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This is the first structured review to identify and summarize research on lifestyle choices that improve health and have the greatest potential to mitigate climate change. Two literature searches were conducted on: (1) active transport health co-benefits, and (2) dietary health co-benefits. Articles needed to quantify both greenhouse gas emissions and health or nutrition outcomes resulting from active transport or diet changes. A data extraction tool (PRISMA) was created for article selection and evaluation. A rubric was devised to assess the biases, limitations and uncertainties of included articles. For active transport 790 articles were retrieved, nine meeting the inclusion criteria. For diet 2524 articles were retrieved, 23 meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of 31 articles were reviewed and assessed using the rubric, as one article met the inclusion criteria for both active transport and diet co-benefits. Methods used to estimate the effect of diet or active transport modification vary greatly precluding meta-analysis. The scale of impact on health and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) outcomes depends predominately on the aggressiveness of the diet or active transport scenario modelled, versus the modelling technique. Effective mitigation policies, infrastructure that supports active transport and low GHGE food delivery, plus community engagement are integral in achieving optimal health and GHGE outcomes. Variation in culture, nutritional and health status, plus geographic density will determine which mitigation scenario(s) best suit individual communities.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] A Study of the Combined Effects of Physical Activity and Air Pollution on Mortality in Elderly Urban Residents: The Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health Cohort
    Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic
    de Nazelle, Audrey
    Mendez, Michelle Ann
    Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
    Hertel, Ole
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Overvad, Kim
    Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole
    Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 123 (06) : 557 - 563
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, GLOBAL HEALTH RISKS: MORTALITY AND BURDEN OF DISEASE ATTRIBUTABLE TO SELECTED MAJOR RISKS, P1
  • [3] Impact of a reduced red and processed meat dietary pattern on disease risks and greenhouse gas emissions in the UK: a modelling study
    Aston, Louise M.
    Smith, James N.
    Powles, John W.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (05):
  • [4] The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices
    Berners-Lee, M.
    Hoolohan, C.
    Cammack, H.
    Hewitt, C. N.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 43 : 184 - 190
  • [5] Reducing our environmental footprint and improving our health: greenhouse gas emission and land use of usual diet and mortality in EPIC-NL: a prospective cohort study
    Biesbroek, Sander
    Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. Bas
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Verschuren, W. M. Monique
    van der Schouw, Yvonne T.
    Kramer, Gerard F. H.
    Tyszler, Marcelo
    Temme, Elisabeth H. M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 13
  • [6] Assessing the impact on chronic disease of incorporating the societal cost of greenhouse gases into the price of food: an econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study
    Briggs, Adam D. M.
    Kehlbacher, Ariane
    Tiffin, Richard
    Garnett, Tara
    Rayner, Mike
    Scarborough, Peter
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (10):
  • [7] Cohen A.J., 2004, Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors, V2, P1353
  • [8] Excessive meat consumption in Brazil: diet quality and environmental impacts
    de Carvalho, Aline Martins
    Galvao Cesar, Chester Luiz
    Fisberg, Regina Mara
    Lobo Marchioni, Dirce Maria
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2013, 16 (10) : 1893 - 1899
  • [9] Diaz S.M., 2019, The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary For Policy Makers, DOI [DOI 10.2833/9937, 10.2833/9937, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, 10.5281/zenodo.3553579., DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3553579]
  • [10] The effect of using consumption taxes on foods to promote climate friendly diets - The case of Denmark
    Edjabou, Louise Dyhr
    Smed, Sinne
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2013, 39 : 84 - 96