Rasch Analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Linear Scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1

被引:14
作者
Franchignoni, Franco
Giordano, Andrea
Vercelli, Stefano
Bravini, Elisabetta
Stissi, Valeria
Ferriero, Giorgio
机构
[1] Ist Clin Sci Maugeri IRCCS, Lissone Monza & Brianza Inst, Pavia, Italy
[2] Ist Clin Sci Maugeri IRCCS, Veruno Novara Inst, Pavia, Italy
[3] Italian Soci Physiotherapy, Milan, Italy
[4] Osped San Giuseppe, MultiMed Holding SpA, UOC Chirurgia Mano, Milan, Italy
关键词
CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; POSAS; REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; VERSIONS; OPINION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) v2.0 is a widely used instrument to evaluate postsurgical scars. Its two subscales respectively investigate the patient's and clinician's opinion on the scar quality. However, psychometric studies of the POSAS have indicated that its metric performance is suboptimal, and structural adjustments may be appropriate. The authors aimed to verify through Rasch analysis the measurement properties of the POSAS v2.0, and propose eventual structural refinements for an easier and more confident use of the scale in clinical practice and research. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to two rehabilitation centers for postsurgery rehabilitation over a 2-year period underwent scar assessments with the POSAS v2.0. We performed Rasch analysis to examine the scale's dimensionality, rating categories, item fit, reliability indices, local item independence, and differential item functioning. Results: The study population consisted of 115 patients. The 10 response options of the POSAS showed malfunctioning, and thus were collapsed, forming a parsimonious five-level rating scale, which helped to improve the measurement accuracy. After that, unidimensionality of both subscales was confirmed. Then, internal construct validity of the POSAS v2.0 was demonstrated (through item fit to the Rasch model). Reliability indices were high (>= 0.80). No significant differential item functioning was detected concerning age or sex. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the good psychometric properties of a simplified Rasch-based version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale with five response options (POSAS v2.1) in patients with postsurgical linear scars, and provides insights for future refinement of the tool.
引用
收藏
页码:1073e / 1079e
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
Fisher WP., RATING SCALE INSTRUM
[12]   Measuring mobility in people with lower limb amputation: Rasch analysis of the Mobility Section of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire [J].
Franchignoni, Franco ;
Giordano, Andrea ;
Ferriero, Giorgio ;
Orlandini, Duccio ;
Amoresano, Amedeo ;
Perucca, Laura .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2007, 39 (02) :138-144
[13]   RASCH VALIDATION OF THE ACTIVITIES-SPECIFIC BALANCE CONFIDENCE SCALE AND ITS SHORT VERSIONS IN PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE [J].
Franchignoni, Franco ;
Giordano, Andrea ;
Ronconi, Gianpaolo ;
Rabini, Alessia ;
Ferriero, Giorgio .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (06) :532-539
[14]   HOW SHOULD WE USE THE VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE (VAS) IN REHABILITATION OUTCOMES? I: HOW MUCH OF WHAT? THE SEDUCTIVE VAS NUMBERS ARE NOT TRUE MEASURES [J].
Franchignoni, Franco ;
Salaffi, Fausto ;
Tesio, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2012, 44 (09) :798-799
[15]   Recent advances in analysis of differential item functioning in health research using the Rasch model [J].
Hagquist, Curt ;
Andrich, David .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
[16]   Good practices for identifying differential item functioning - Commentary [J].
Hambleton, Ronald K. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (11) :S182-S188
[17]  
Linacre J M, 1999, J Outcome Meas, V3, P103
[18]  
Linacre J.M., 2018, A user's guide to WINSTEPS Rasch-model computer programs
[19]  
Linacre JM, ITEM BIAS MANTEL HAE
[20]   Interpretation and precision of the Observer Scar Assessment Scale improved by a revised scoring [J].
Lindeboom, Jerome A. ;
van Coppenraet, Elisabeth S. Bruijnesteijn ;
Kuijper, Ed J. ;
Polsbroek, Roger M. ;
Horsthuis, Roy B. ;
Prins, Jan M. ;
Lindeboom, Robert .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (12) :1289-1295