Socio-economic aspects of CCS technologies

被引:31
|
作者
Karayannis, Vayos [1 ]
Charalampides, Georgios [1 ]
Lakioti, Evangelia [1 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Western Macedonia, Dept Environm Engn, Kila 50100, Kozani, Greece
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ECONOMICS (ICOAE 2014) | 2014年 / 14卷
关键词
Carbon dioxide; Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS); Social acceptance; Economic aspects; CARBON CAPTURE; STORAGE CCS; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; CO2; FOCUS; PERCEPTIONS; DEPLOYMENT; PROSPECTS; OUTLOOK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00716-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Economic viability and public support are key factors of concern, along with technological advancement and ecological impact, for the implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies, an increasingly urgent priority, to contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions linked to global climate change, and building a low-carbon economy towards sustainable development. In the present study, recent socio-economic aspects of CCS technologies are discussed. Although real cost estimation for CCS is generally considered a difficult task, an estimated relatively high cost and energy requirements of these technologies, along with an uncertainty over public acceptance of CCS, appear major barriers to the deployment of a substantial commercial market, constraining the economic viability and policy making for the application of CCS. The full life-cycle cost of CCS must be considered in an overall social/environmental/economic/political context. Social research conducted using various tools can provide an insight into several factors influencing and shaping public awareness and perceptions of CCS, in order to promote communication of expert knowledge and participation, and to enhance the required social acceptance for the advancement of these technologies. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 302
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Representing Socio-Economic Uncertainty in Human System Models
    Morris, Jennifer
    Reilly, John
    Paltsev, Sergey
    Sokolov, Andrei
    Cox, Kenneth
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2022, 10 (04)
  • [32] Socio-economic impacts of marine conservation efforts in three Indonesian fishing communities
    Eriksson, Bjorn
    Johansson, Frank
    Blicharska, Malgorzata
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 103 : 59 - 67
  • [33] Socio-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Solar Irrigation Systems for Sustainable Agricultural Production
    Guno, Charmaine Samala
    Agaton, Casper Boongaling
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [34] Socio-economic Determinants of Environmental Performance in Developing Countries
    Madni, Ghulam Rasool
    Anwar, Muhammad Awais
    Ahmad, Nawaz
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2022, 13 (02) : 1157 - 1168
  • [35] Socio-economic drivers of increasing number of slums in Chile
    Vergara-Perucich, Francisco
    GEOSCAPE, 2022, 16 (01): : 55 - 64
  • [36] Migrant workers in Japan: socio-economic conditions and policy
    Hosogaya, Nobuko
    ASIAN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2021, 10 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [37] How predictions of economic behavior are affected by the socio-economic status of the target person
    Lindqvist, Anna
    Bjorklund, Fredrik
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 158 (03): : 361 - 378
  • [38] Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change
    Lambin, Eric F.
    Meyfroidt, Patrick
    LAND USE POLICY, 2010, 27 (02) : 108 - 118
  • [39] Quantifying the Impact of Urban Form and Socio-Economic Development on China's Carbon Emissions
    Huang, Cheng
    Qu, Yang
    Huang, Lingfang
    Meng, Xing
    Chen, Yulong
    Pan, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (05)
  • [40] Investigation of the socio-economic feasibility of installing wind turbines to produce hydrogen: Case study
    Rezaei, Mostafa
    Salimi, Malikeh
    Momeni, Mozhgan
    Mostafaeipour, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (52) : 23135 - 23147