Fairness conceptions and self-determined mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: Is there a relationship?

被引:10
作者
Saelen, Hakon [1 ,2 ]
Torstad, Vegard [3 ,4 ]
Holz, Ceecee [5 ,6 ]
Nielsen, Tobias Dan [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] CICERO Ctr Int Climate Res, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Polit Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] European Univ Inst, Dept Polit & Social Sci, Florence, Italy
[4] Univ Oslo, Fac Law, PluriCourts, Oslo, Norway
[5] Carleton Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Climate Equ Reference Project, Berkeley, CA USA
[7] Lund Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Lund, Sweden
[8] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Ambition; Fairness; Equity; UNFCCC; Paris Agreement; Climate negotiations; EQUITY; TARGETS; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the empirical relationship between countries' expressed concerns with fairness and the ambition levels in their pledged contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement, asking the following questions: 1) Are the NDCs of countries who express the most concern with fairness more or less ambitious than those of other countries? 2) Does the relationship between fairness and ambition vary across the three fairness principles: Responsibility, Capability, and Rights (needs)? and 3) Is there a tendency for countries to support the fairness principle that implies the largest emissions share for themselves if that principle were used to allocate emissions across countries? The analysis reveals considerable variation in both fairness concerns and assessed NDC ambitions, but no clear relationship between the two. Countries' expressed support for fairness principles does not correlate with the ambition levels of their NDCs, whether principles are aggregated or disaggregated. The analysis also finds no evidence that countries strategically advocate the fairness principle that allocates them the largest "fair" emissions share.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 254
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIMATE EQUITY REFER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PRINCIPLES ECONOMETR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, UN FRAMEWORK CONVENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEW CLIMATE AGREEMEN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 491 U GOTH
[6]  
Barry Brian., 1989, Theories of Justice
[7]  
Bodanski D., 1993, Yale Journal of International Law, V18, P451
[8]  
Breakey H., 2016, FAIRNESS AGENDA UN B
[9]  
Caney S., 2005, Leiden Journal of International Law, V18, P747, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0922156505002992
[10]  
Caney Simon, 2009, Journal of Global Ethics, V5, P125, DOI [10.1080/17449620903110300, DOI 10.1080/17449620903110300]