Mapping the evolution and current trends in climate change adaptation science

被引:133
作者
Nalau, Johanna [1 ,2 ]
Verrall, Brodie [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Adaptat Sci Res Grp, Cities Res Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Environm Futures Res Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Climate change adaptation; Adaptation theory; Climate adaptation science; Multicomponent bibliometric analysis; VOSviewer; ECOSYSTEM-BASED ADAPTATION; DISASTER RISK REDUCTION; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; SUSTAINABLE ADAPTATION; AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS; CHANGE VULNERABILITY; FARMERS PERCEPTIONS; SCHOLARLY NETWORKS; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.crm.2021.100290
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research on climate change adaptation has increased in number and significance since the 1970s. Yet, the volume of information on adaptation is now difficult to manage given its vast scope and spread across journals, institutions, disciplines and themes. While an increasing number of researchers have used systematic literature reviews to analyse particular themes within this rapidly growing field of research, there is still missing an overall analysis of the current state of climate change adaptation science literature and its evolution. This paper fills this gap by providing a multifaceted bibliometric review of climate change adaptation science literature that is focused on the human dimensions and how it has been constructed across time, disciplines, social relationships and geographies. Our novel review, spanning from 1978 to mid-2020, identifies the underpinning foundations of climate change adaptation literature, leading authors, countries and organisations as well as dominant research themes and priorities and explores how these have changed over time. Our results show an annual average increase of 28.5% in climate change adaptation publications, with over 26,000 authors publishing on this topic, and increasing diversity in publishing sources. Priority research topics and themes have been dynamic over time, while some core concepts (vulnerability, resilience, adaptive capacity) and sectors (water, agriculture) have remained relatively stable. The key challenge going forward is how to consolidate this vast research endeavour into a more coherent adaptation theory that in turn can better guide science of adaptation and support adaptation policy and practice (science for adaptation).
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 201 条
[1]  
Adger W. N., 2003, Progress in Development Studies, V3, P179, DOI 10.1191/1464993403ps060oa
[2]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[3]   Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? [J].
Adger, W. Neil ;
Dessai, Suraje ;
Goulden, Marisa ;
Hulme, Mike ;
Lorenzoni, Irene ;
Nelson, Donald R. ;
Naess, Lars Otto ;
Wolf, Johanna ;
Wreford, Anita .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 93 (3-4) :335-354
[4]  
Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
[5]  
Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EARTHSCAN READER CLI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, RANGE GEN TRIUMPH SP
[9]   Understanding Farmer Perspectives on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: The Roles of Trust in Sources of Climate Information, Climate Change Beliefs, and Perceived Risk [J].
Arbuckle, J. Gordon, Jr. ;
Morton, Lois Wright ;
Hobbs, Jon .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 47 (02) :205-234
[10]  
Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX