Synthesizing multiple ecosystem service assessments for urban planning: A review of approaches, and recommendations

被引:53
作者
Cortinovis, Chiara [1 ]
Geneletti, Davide [2 ]
Hedlund, Katarina [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Sci, Ecol Bldg,Solvegatan 37, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Trento, Dept Civil Environm & Mech Engn, Via Mesiano 77, I-38123 Trento, Italy
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Biol, Ecol Bldg,Solvegatan 37, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Knowledge synthesis; Evidence-based decision-making; Urban planning; Ecosystem service assessment; Integrated valuation; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; TRADE-OFFS; INTEGRATED VALUATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SYNERGIES; BUNDLES; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104129
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
While ecosystem service (ES) assessments become a more and more important source of knowledge, there is a need for synthesis approaches that make the results usable to support decisions. Effective synthesis approaches can reduce the information burden produced by multiple ES assessments and help decision-makers to compare alternative options and to assess their impacts. In this review, we focus on urban planning, one of the main decision-making processes that affect ES in cities, and investigate what synthesis approaches have been applied to support planning decisions. The aim is to identify the options available and to analyze their suitability to different urban planning decisions, thus providing a guidance to potential users. We reviewed 62 studies selected through a search in two literature databases and identified six recurring synthesis approaches: diversity, average, weighted summation, multi-criteria analysis, optimization algorithms, and efficiency indicators; and a limited number of methods developed ad-hoc for specific applications. For each approach, we collected evidence about the appropriateness for different decision-making contexts, the applicability to different ES categories and types of assessment methods, and the occurrence of complementary analyses of ES interactions. Further, we built on the reviewed publications to identify pros and cons, including critical aspects related to the usability of the approaches, such as their complexity, transparency, and the level of stakeholder involvement. Based on the findings, we draw recommendations on how to select suitable synthesis approaches to support different urban planning decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
Aevermann T, 2015, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V59, P188
[2]   A framework for assessing urban greenery's effects and valuing its ecosystem services [J].
Andersson-Skold, Yvonne ;
Klingberg, Jenny ;
Gunnarsson, Bengt ;
Cullinane, Kevin ;
Gustafsson, Ingela ;
Hedblom, Marcus ;
Knez, Igor ;
Lindberg, Fredrik ;
Sang, Asa Ode ;
Pleijel, Hakan ;
Thorsson, Pontus ;
Thorsson, Sofia .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 205 :274-285
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on 'Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities, DOI 10.2777/765301
[4]  
Anthony R. N, 1965, PLANNING CONTROL FRA
[5]   Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: Insights for landscape planning and management [J].
Baro, Francesc ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Haase, Dagmar .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 24 :147-159
[6]   (Dis) integrated valuation - Assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support [J].
Barton, D. N. ;
Kelemen, E. ;
Dick, J. ;
Martin-Lopez, B. ;
Gomez-Baggethun, E. ;
Jacobs, S. ;
Hendriks, C. M. A. ;
Termansen, M. ;
Garcia-Llorente, M. ;
Primmer, E. ;
Dunford, R. ;
Harrison, P. A. ;
Turkelboom, F. ;
Saarikoski, H. ;
van Dijk, J. ;
Rusch, G. M. ;
Palomo, I. ;
Yli-Pelkonen, V. J. ;
Carvalho, L. ;
Baro, F. ;
Langemeyer, J. ;
van der Wal, J. Tjalling ;
Mederly, P. ;
Priess, J. A. ;
Luque, S. ;
Berry, P. ;
Santos, R. ;
Odee, D. ;
Martines Pastur, G. ;
Garcia Blanco, G. ;
Saarela, S-R. ;
Silaghi, D. ;
Pataki, G. ;
Masi, F. ;
Vadineanu, A. ;
Mukhopadhyay, R. ;
Lapola, D. M. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 29 :529-541
[7]  
Bennett Elena M, 2016, F1000Res, V5, P2622
[8]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[9]   Water resources management in the urban agglomeration of the Lake Biwa region, Japan: An ecosystem services-based sustainability assessment [J].
Chen, Xiaochen ;
Chen, Yuqing ;
Shimizu, Toshiyuki ;
Niu, Jia ;
Nakagami, Ken'ichi ;
Qian, Xuepeng ;
Jia, Baoju ;
Nakajima, Jun ;
Han, Ji ;
Li, Jianhua .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 586 :174-187
[10]   Setting conservation priorities in cities: approaches, targets and planning units adapted to wetland biodiversity and ecosystem services [J].
Cimon-Morin, Jerome ;
Poulin, Monique .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2018, 33 (11) :1975-1995