Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review

被引:46
作者
Manso, Maria A. [1 ]
Guittet, Catherine [1 ]
Vandenhende, Francois [2 ]
Granier, Luc-Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Advicenne, Clin Affairs, 2 Rue Briconnet, F-30000 Nimes, France
[2] ClinBay, Stat, Genappe, Belgium
关键词
benzodiazepines; clinical efficacy; hypnotics and sedatives; pediatrics; preanesthetic medication; randomized trials; LOW-DOSE COMBINATION; PREOPERATIVE ANXIETY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; NITROUS-OXIDE; PREMEDICATION; KETAMINE; TRIAL; RELIABILITY; INTRANASAL; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.13747
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
One of the most widely used options for minimal/moderate sedation in pediatric patients is oral midazolam, as it presents an alternative to less well-accepted routes of administration (eg, intravenous or intranasal) of this well-known efficacious and well-tolerated short-acting benzodiazepine. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to identify clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric patients in the context of premedication before anesthesia or during diagnostic/treatment procedures. The percentage of responders (response rate) after single administration of oral midazolam was evaluated and compared versus placebo in a subset of placebo-controlled studies. The range of oral midazolam doses providing effective sedation in the different pediatric age subsets was analyzed in order to assess optimum dosing strategies. A total of 25 pediatric clinical studies, utilizing a variety of measures of sedation effectiveness, were selected. These studies included a total of 1472 patients (aged 4 months-18 years) treated with midazolam (0.25-1.5 mg/kg) and 138 patients treated with placebo. The response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranged from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%], while with placebo response rates ranged from 4.0% [0.6%, 23.5%] to 41.0% [29.4%, 53.6%]. When considering the 4 placebo-controlled studies, the odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for the comparison of midazolam vs. placebo ranged from 13.4 [5.0, 36.0] to 25.9 [6.7, 100.6]. The analysis of subgroups by context of sedation showed response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranging from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.0% [94.8%, 98.3%] for anesthetic premedication and from 56.1% [43.1%, 68.4] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%] for medical procedures. The efficacy of midazolam for pediatric minimal/moderate sedation from a dose of 0.25 mg/kg and above was demonstrated. The probability of occurrence of adverse events and over-sedation increases with increasing doses.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1106
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] ORAL PREMEDICATION FOR PEDIATRIC AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE
    ALDERSON, PJ
    LERMAN, J
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (03): : 221 - 226
  • [2] Brewer Stephanie, 2006, J Pediatr Nurs, V21, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.pedn.2005.06.004
  • [3] Midazolam premedication in children: A comparison of two oral dosage formulations on sedation score and plasma midazolam levels
    Brosius, KK
    Bannister, CF
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (02) : 392 - 395
  • [4] Oral Midazolam premedication in preadolescents and adolescents
    Brosius, KK
    Bannister, CF
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [5] CHERNIK DA, 1990, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V10, P244
  • [6] Midazolam for sedation before procedures
    Conway, Aaron
    Rolley, John
    Sutherland, Joanna R.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (05):
  • [7] Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: Update 2016
    Cote, Charles J.
    Wilson, Stephen
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2016, 138 (01)
  • [8] Coté CJ, 2002, ANESTH ANALG, V94, P37
  • [9] Damle S G, 2008, J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, V26, P97
  • [10] Oral ketamine or midazolam or low dose combination for premedication in children
    Darlong, V
    Shende, D
    Subramanyam, MS
    Sunder, R
    Naik, A
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2004, 32 (02) : 246 - 249