Symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Upstaging risk and predictors

被引:11
作者
Venkatesh, Sheila L. [1 ]
Oseni, Tawakalitu O. [2 ]
Bahl, Manisha [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 55 Fruit St,WAC 240, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Invasive ductal carcinoma;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.050
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate the upstaging risk of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive disease and to identify features related to upstaging risk. Materials and methods: This retrospective investigation includes symptomatic women with DCIS at core needle biopsy from January 2007 to December 2016 at a large academic institution. Patient characteristics, findings at imaging, core needle biopsy histopathology results, and final surgical histopathology results were retrieved from the medical records. Using standard statistical tests, patient, imaging, and pathology features were compared between DCIS cases that were upstaged to invasive disease at surgery versus cases that were not upstaged. Results: From 2007 to 2016, fewer than 5% (63/1399) of women diagnosed with DCIS presented with symptoms. Therefore, 63 women (mean age, 51; range, 27-88 years) comprised the study cohort. 84.1% (n = 53) presented with an area of clinical concern, and 15.9% (n = 10) presented with pathologic nipple discharge. The most common finding at mammography was calcifications with or without an associated asymmetry or mass (74.1%, 40/54). The upstaging rate of symptomatic DCIS to invasive disease was 34.9% (22/63). Imaging modality used for biopsy was associated with higher upstaging risk, with cases that were biopsied under MRI guidance accounting for 22.7% of upstaged cases versus 4.9% of non-upstaged cases (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Women with DCIS uncommonly present with symptoms, and the upstaging rate of symptomatic DCIS is high at nearly 35%. Biopsy modality type of MRI is associated with higher upstaging risk.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] American College of Radiology, TEST OV BREAST MRI
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, ACR BIRADS ATLAS BR
  • [3] The frequency of presentation and clinico-pathological characteristics of symptomatic versus screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Barnes, N. L. P.
    Dimopoulos, N.
    Williams, K. E.
    Howe, M.
    Bundred, N. J.
    [J]. EJSO, 2014, 40 (03): : 249 - 254
  • [4] Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
    Bevers, Therese B.
    Anderson, Benjamin O.
    Bonaccio, Ermelinda
    Buys, Sandra
    Daly, Mary B.
    Dempsey, Peter J.
    Farrar, William B.
    Fleming, Irving
    Garber, Judy E.
    Harris, Randall E.
    Heerdt, Alexandra S.
    Helvie, Mark
    Huff, John G.
    Khakpour, Nazanin
    Khan, Seema A.
    Krontiras, Helen
    Lyman, Gary
    Rafferty, Elizabeth
    Shaw, Sara
    Smith, Mary Lou
    Tsangaris, Theodore N.
    Williams, Cheryl
    Yaneeklov, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2009, 7 (10): : 1060 - 1096
  • [5] Ductal Carcinoma in Situ at Core-Needle Biopsy: Meta-Analysis of Underestimation and Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer
    Brennan, Meagan E.
    Turner, Robin M.
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    French, James R.
    Macaskill, Petra
    Houssami, Nehmat
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (01) : 119 - 128
  • [6] Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ - The LORD study
    Elshof, Lotte E.
    Tryfonidis, Konstantinos
    Slaets, Leen
    van Leeuwen-Stok, A. Elise
    Skinner, Victoria P.
    Dif, Nicolas
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Bijker, Nina
    Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
    Wesseling, Jelle
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (12) : 1497 - 1510
  • [7] Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial
    Francis, Adele
    Thomas, Jeremy
    Fallowfield, Lesley
    Wallis, Matthew
    Bartlett, John M. S.
    Brookes, Cassandra
    Roberts, Tracy
    Pirrie, Sarah
    Gaunt, Claire
    Young, Jennie
    Billingham, Lucinda
    Dodwell, David
    Hanby, Andrew
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    Evans, Andrew
    Reed, Malcolm
    Jenkins, Valerie
    Matthews, Lucy
    Wilcox, Maggie
    Fairbrother, Patricia
    Bowden, Sarah
    Rea, Daniel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (16) : 2296 - 2303
  • [8] Is there a role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ?: analysis of 587 cases
    Goyal, Amit
    Douglas-Jones, Anthony
    Monypenny, Ian
    Sweetland, Helen
    Stevens, Guy
    Mansel, Robert E.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 98 (03) : 311 - 314
  • [9] Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
    Gradishar, William J.
    Anderson, Benjamin O.
    Balassanian, Ron
    Blair, Sarah L.
    Burstein, Harold J.
    Cyr, Amy
    Elias, Anthony D.
    Farrar, William B.
    Forero, Andres
    Giordano, Sharon H.
    Goetz, Matthew P.
    Goldstein, Lori J.
    Isakoff, Steven J.
    Lyons, Janice
    Marcom, P. Kelly
    Mayer, Ingrid A.
    McCormick, Beryl
    Moran, Meena S.
    O'Regan, Ruth M.
    Patel, Sameer A.
    Pierce, Lori J.
    Reed, Elizabeth C.
    Salerno, Kilian E.
    Schwartzberg, Lee S.
    Sitapati, Amy
    Smith, Karen Lisa
    Smith, Mary Lou
    Soliman, Hatem
    Somlo, George
    Telli, Melinda L.
    Ward, John H.
    Kumar, Rashmi
    Shead, Dorothy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (03): : 310 - 320
  • [10] Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy - Concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Ellis, Ian
    Ambrogetti, Daniela
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 109 (03) : 487 - 495