Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of outcome measurements for schizophrenia -: EPSILON Study 2

被引:63
作者
Knudsen, HC [1 ]
Vázquez-Barquero, JL
Welcher, B
Gaite, L
Becker, T
Chisholm, D
Ruggeri, M
Schene, AH
Thornicroft, G
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Copenhagen Hosp Corp, Inst Prevent Med, DK-1399 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Univ Cantabria, Clin & Social Psychiat Res Unit, E-39005 Santander, Spain
[3] Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Leipzig, Dept Psychiat, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ London Kings Coll, Ctr Econ Mental Hlth, London WC2R 2LS, England
[6] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[7] Univ Verona, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[8] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Univ London Kings Coll, Sect Community Psychiat, PRiSM, Inst Psychiat, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
D O I
10.1192/bjp.177.39.s8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Research on the comparison of mental health services has identified the need for internationally standardised and reliable measurements. Aims To describe the strategies adopted in the European Psychiatric Services: inputs Linked to Outcome Domains and Needs (EPSILON) Study for the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of five European versions of the instruments. Method A protocol was developed for translation of the outcome scales, describing each step in the translation procedure. Disputed items were discussed in focus groups, which faced seven tasks: a list of topics to be discussed; choosing where the group should meet; composition of participants; conducting the group; data collection; data completion afterwards; reporting results. Results Modifications made to instruments were: changes in the instrument structure, contents and concepts; adjustments to the instrument structure; and modifications to the instrument manual. Conclusion Use of focus groups is an adequate method to apply if concepts, constructs and translation issues are to be addressed; otherwise, less time-consuming methods should be considered. Declaration of interest No conflict of interest. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
引用
收藏
页码:S8 / S14
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SOC WORK SOC SCI REV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, CROSS CULTURAL HLTH
[3]   FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW - AN UNDERUTILIZED RESEARCH TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVING THEORY AND PRACTICE IN HEALTH-EDUCATION [J].
BASCH, CE .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1987, 14 (04) :411-448
[4]  
Beecham J., 1992, MEASURING MENTAL HLT, V2nd
[5]  
Bogardus ES, 1926, J APPL SOCIOL, V10, P372
[6]  
Bojlen N S, 1995, Ugeskr Laeger, V157, P3315
[7]   Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory - European Version: Development of an instrument for international research - EPSILON Study 5 [J].
Chisholm, D ;
Knapp, MRJ ;
Knudsen, HC ;
Amaddeo, F ;
Gaite, L ;
van Wijngaarden, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 177 :S28-S33
[8]   Quality of life in schizophrenia:: development, reliability and internal consistency of the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile -: European Version -: EPSILON Study 8 [J].
Gaite, L ;
Vázquez-Barquero, JL ;
Arrizabalaga, AA ;
Schene, AH ;
Welcher, B ;
Thornicroft, G ;
Ruggeri, M ;
Vázquez-Bourgon, E ;
Retuerto, MP ;
Leese, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 177 :S49-S54
[9]  
Gaite L., 1997, Archivos de Neurobiologica, V60, P91
[10]   SCALED VERSION OF THE GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
GOLDBERG, DP ;
HILLIER, VF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1979, 9 (01) :139-145