The benefits and challenges of participating in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) initiatives following institutional formalization in Chile

被引:26
作者
Hruschka, Nikolaus [1 ]
Kaufmann, Sonja [1 ]
Vogl, Christian R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna BOKU, Div Organ Farming, Working Grp Knowledge Syst & Innovat, Gregor Mendel Str 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Farmer organizations; Chile; organic certification; participation; non-participation; Participatory Guarantee Systems; PGS initiatives; ORGANIC CERTIFICATION; RURAL-DEVELOPMENT; FARMERS; CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONS; MEXICO;
D O I
10.1080/14735903.2021.1934364
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) provide an alternative certification system for smallholder organic farmers producing for the domestic market. Officially recognized in Chile since 2007, PGS certification has grown in momentum in recent years. We used semi-structured interviews, surveys and participant observations to shed light on the PGS movement in Chile and the respective governance framework. Our results indicate that after PGS formalization, Chilean PGS initiatives struggle to comply with wide-ranging administrative procedures similar to those requested for third-party certification (TPC). Furthermore, lacking resources among PGS initiatives inhibit the PGS movement from impacting the national discourse. We present two PGS initiatives and their organizational structures, exploring 'who' participate, 'how' participation occurs, and 'what kind' of participation takes place. Our results indicate that the interaction as well as the exchange of knowledge among PGS members is a central benefit perceived by PGS participants. However, regular PGS member participation is hindered by the required time investment, the distance that PGS members need to travel and the perceived lacking expertise they have.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 407
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Abatena H., 1997, Journal of Community Practice, V4, P13, DOI DOI 10.1300/J125v04n02_02
[2]  
Adasme-Berríos C, 2015, REV FAC CIENC AGRAR, V47, P193
[3]   Incentives and Community Participation in the Governance of Community Forests in Nepal [J].
Adhikari, Sunit ;
Kingi, Tanira ;
Ganesh, Siva .
SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2016, 15 (02) :179-197
[4]   Evaluation and Reliability of the Organic Certification System: Perceptions by Farmers in Latin America [J].
Albersmeier, Friederike ;
Schulze, Holger ;
Spiller, Achim .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 17 (05) :311-324
[5]  
Altieri M.A, 2010, REV AMBIENTE DESARRO, V24, P24
[6]   Cost and value of stakeholders participation: A systematic literature review [J].
Anggraeni, Mustika ;
Gupta, Joyeeta ;
Verrest, Hebe J. L. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2019, 101 :364-373
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Participatory guarantee systems for organic agriculture
[8]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[9]   What farmers want: collective capacity for sustainable entrepreneurship [J].
Ashby, Jacqueline ;
Heinrich, Geoffrey ;
Burpee, Gaye ;
Remington, Thomas ;
Wilson, Kim ;
Arturo Quiros, Carlos ;
Aldana, Marco ;
Ferris, Shaun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2009, 7 (02) :130-146
[10]   Smallholder farmers and organic certification: Accessing the EU market from the developing world [J].
Barrett, HR ;
Browne, AW ;
Harris, PJC ;
Cadoret, K .
BIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE, 2001, 19 (02) :183-199