Irrational behavior in the adoption of innovations

被引:2
作者
Laguna, M. F. [1 ,2 ]
Iglesias, J. R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Goncalves, Sebastian [3 ]
机构
[1] CNEA, Ctr Atom Bariloche, Ave E Bustillo 9500,R8402AGP, San Carlos De Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Ave E Bustillo 9500,R8402AGP, San Carlos De Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Inst Fis, BR-91501970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] UNISINOS, Management & Business Sch, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] CBPF, Inst Nacl Ciencia & Tecnol Sistemas Complexos, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Innovation adoption; Complex systems; Social systems; Herding; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2019.122388
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Classical Economics Theories mostly assume that consumer decisions are made based on rational evaluation according to the utility of a given good. Following this idea, most of the studies on the adoption of technological innovations suppose some kind of rationality behind the individual's decisions. Here, we choose a different point of view and address the role of non-rational agents in the dynamics of the adoption of innovations in a simple agent-based model. We consider three kind of non-rational agents: oniomaniacs, impulsive buyers, and flickers. Oniomaniacs are people suffering a compulsion to buy novelties, impulsive buyers are persons acting on the impel of the moment, and flickers are agents that impulsively change its adoption status, whatever it is. In our model, such agents coexist with rational individuals who follow adoption rules determined mainly by three elements: the appeal of the novelty, the inertia or resistance to adopt it, and the interaction with other agents. In order to account for societies with different idiosyncrasies, two different distributions of the agent's inertia have been considered. Moreover, the model incorporates the possibility of repentance and allows two type of rational agents, called mimetic and contrarians. We analyze the effect of non-rational agents in the dynamics of adoption and find that they increase the speed of the adoption process. Moreover, a few impulsive buyers are enough to produce total adoption and neutralize the role of contrarians. We also find that the interplay between flickers and repentants brings new features in the adoption final states, which have a non obvious dependence with the parameters of the model. The non-rational agents considered here produce non-linear effects in the dynamics of adoption, making it more realistic when compared with our previous models. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Models and methods in social network analysis, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511811395.006
[3]   NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES [J].
BASS, FM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05) :215-227
[4]  
Besanko D., 2013, Microeconomics, V5th
[5]   The Effects of Market Network Heterogeneity on Innovation Diffusion: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach [J].
Bohlmann, Jonathan D. ;
Calantone, Roger J. ;
Zhao, Meng .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (05) :741-760
[6]   Chaotic, staggered, and polarized dynamics in opinion forming: The contrarian effect [J].
Borghesi, Christian ;
Galam, Serge .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2006, 73 (06)
[7]  
Cartwright Edward., 2018, BEHAV EC
[8]   Impact of contrarians and intransigents in a kinetic model of opinion dynamics [J].
Crokidakis, Nuno ;
Blanco, Victor H. ;
Anteneodo, Celia .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2014, 89 (01)
[9]   Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: "the hung elections scenario" [J].
Galam, S .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2004, 333 (1-4) :453-460
[10]   Sociophysics: A review of Galam models [J].
Galam, Serge .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2008, 19 (03) :409-440