共 55 条
Comparing self-guided learning and educator-guided learning formats for simulation-based clinical training
被引:46
作者:
Brydges, Ryan
[1
,2
]
Carnahan, Heather
[1
,3
]
Rose, Don
[4
]
Dubrowski, Adam
[1
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Ctr Hlth Educ Scholarship, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[4] Ryerson Univ, Daphne Cockwell Sch Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Learning Inst, Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
基金:
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词:
clinical training;
educator-guided learning;
nurse education;
proficiency-based training;
self assessment;
self-directed learning;
simulation;
COMMUNICATION-SKILLS;
CONTROLLED FEEDBACK;
MEDICAL-EDUCATION;
TECHNICAL SKILLS;
PERFORMANCE;
CURRICULUM;
FIDELITY;
ACQUISITION;
TECHNOLOGY;
STUDENTS;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05338.x
中图分类号:
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号:
1011 ;
摘要:
P>Title. Comparing self-guided learning and educator-guided learning formats for simulation-based clinical training. Aim. In this paper, we tested the over-arching hypothesis that progressive self-guided learning offers equivalent learning benefit vs. proficiency-based training while limiting the need to set proficiency standards. Background. We have shown that self-guided learning is enhanced when students learn on simulators that progressively increase in fidelity during practice. Proficiency-based training, a current gold-standard training approach, requires achievement of a criterion score before students advance to the next learning level. Methods. Baccalaureate nursing students (n = 15/group) practised intravenous catheterization using simulators that differed in fidelity (i.e. students' perceived realism). Data were collected in 2008. Proficiency-based students advanced from low- to mid- to high-fidelity after achieving a proficiency criterion at each level. Progressive students self-guided their progression from low- to mid- to high-fidelity. Yoked control students followed an experimenter-defined progressive practice schedule. Open-ended students moved freely between the simulators. One week after practice, blinded experts evaluated students' skill transfer on a standardized patient simulation. Group differences were examined using analyses of variance. Results. Proficiency-based students scored highest on the high-fidelity post-test (effect size = 1 center dot 22). An interaction effect showed that the Progressive and Open-ended groups maintained their performance from post-test to transfer test, whereas the Proficiency-based and Yoked control groups experienced a significant decrease (P < 0 center dot 05). Surprisingly, most Open-ended students (73%) chose the progressive practice schedule. Conclusion. Progressive training and proficiency-based training resulted in equivalent transfer test performance, suggesting that progressive students effectively self-guided when to transition between simulators. Students' preference for the progressive practice schedule indicates that educators should consider this sequence for simulation-based training.
引用
收藏
页码:1832 / 1844
页数:13
相关论文