MODEL-BASED EVENT-TRIGGERED PREDICTIVE CONTROL FOR NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH DATA DROPOUT

被引:56
作者
Yin, Xiuxia [1 ]
Yue, Dong [2 ]
Hu, Songlin [2 ]
Peng, Chen [3 ]
Xue, Yusheng [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Math, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Inst Adv Technol, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ, Sch Mechatron Engn & Automat, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[4] State Grid Elect Power Res Inst, Nanjing 211006, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
event-triggered communication; networked control systems; model-based predictive control; data-dropout; COMMUNICATION DELAYS; LINEAR-SYSTEMS; PACKET DROPOUTS; CONTROL SCHEME; DESIGN; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1137/130950951
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a novel structure of networked control systems (NCSs) with communication logic, which incorporates model-based networked control systems (MB-NCSs), predictive control, and an event-triggered communication scheme into a unified framework to consider the bandwidth reduction of the network communications. Within this framework, first an event-triggered communication scheme at the sensor side is introduced to determine whether or not the sensor measurement should be transmitted to the controller through the imperfect forward paths. Second, at the controller, a model of the plant is used to predict future state behavior of the plant, and based on the predicted state between successful transmission instants, a novel predictive event-triggering scheme is proposed to compress the size of the packetized control signals transmitted from the controller side to the actuator side through feedback paths. Finally, a unified model of NCSs is established. Based on this model, a codesign condition of the two event-triggering schemes and state feedback controller gain in terms of linear matrix inequality will be derived, using a common quadratic Lyapunov approach. The advantage of the model presented in this paper in comparison to the existing event-based models is that it can compensate for the effect of data-dropout on the closed-loop system actively while requiring less bandwidth without sacrificing stability of the closed-loop system, which will be demonstrated by a practical example at the end of this article.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 586
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   STOCHASTIC HYBRID SYSTEMS WITH RENEWAL TRANSITIONS: MOMENT ANALYSIS WITH APPLICATION TO NETWORKED CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH DELAYS [J].
Antunes, Duarte ;
Hespanha, Joao P. ;
Silvestre, Carlos .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 51 (02) :1481-1499
[2]  
Berglind J. B., 2012, IFAC P VOLUMES, V45, P342, DOI [DOI 10.3182/20120823-5-NL-3013.00058, https://doi.org/10.3182/20120823-5-NL-3013.00058, DOI 10.3182/20120823-5-nl-3013.00058]
[3]   Delay Compensation in Model Predictive Current Control of a Three-Phase Inverter [J].
Cortes, Patricio ;
Rodriguez, Jose ;
Silva, Cesar ;
Flores, Alexis .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2012, 59 (02) :1323-1325
[4]   STABILIZATION OF NETWORKED CONTROL SYSTEMS VIA DYNAMIC OUTPUT-FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS [J].
Gao, Huijun ;
Meng, Xiangyu ;
Chen, Tongwen ;
Lam, James .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 48 (05) :3643-3658
[5]   Model-Based Event-Triggered Control for Systems With Quantization and Time-Varying Network Delays [J].
Garcia, Eloy ;
Antsaklis, Panos J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2013, 58 (02) :422-434
[6]  
Garcia E, 2011, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P1650, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2011.6160257
[7]   Networked Control System: Overview and Research Trends [J].
Gupta, Rachana Ashok ;
Chow, Mo-Yuen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2010, 57 (07) :2527-2535
[8]  
Heemels W., 2014, AUTOMATICA J IFAC, V50, P1279
[9]   Model-based periodic event-triggered control for linear systems [J].
Heemels, W. P. M. H. ;
Donkers, M. C. F. .
AUTOMATICA, 2013, 49 (03) :698-711
[10]   Periodic Event-Triggered Control for Linear Systems [J].
Heemels, W. P. M. H. ;
Donkers, M. C. F. ;
Teel, Andrew R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2013, 58 (04) :847-861