Assessment of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening: Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT

被引:34
作者
Garcia-Velloso, Maria J. [1 ]
Bastarrika, Gorka [2 ]
de-Torres, Juan P. [3 ]
Lozano, Maria D. [4 ]
Sanchez-Salcedo, Pablo [5 ]
Sancho, Lidia [1 ]
Nunez-Cordoba, Jorge M. [6 ]
Campo, Arantza [3 ]
Alcaide, Ana B. [3 ]
Torre, Wenceslao [7 ]
Richter, Jose A. [1 ]
Zulueta, Javier J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Nucl Med, Av Pio XII 36, Pamplona 31008, Spain
[2] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Radiol, Pamplona, Spain
[3] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Pulmonol, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Pathol, Pamplona, Spain
[5] Complejo Hosp Navarra, Dept Pulmonol, Pamplona, Spain
[6] Univ Navarra, Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth,Sch Med, Div Biostat,Res Support Serv,Cent Clin Trials Uni, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
[7] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Thorac Surg, Pamplona, Spain
关键词
F-18-FDG; PET/CT; Lung nodule; Lung cancer screening; Diagnostic accuracy; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; F-18-FDG PET; CT; SENSITIVITY; MANAGEMENT; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.04.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: A major drawback of lung cancer screening programs is the high frequency of false-positive findings on computed tomography (CT). We investigated the accuracy of selective 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scan in assessing radiologically indeterminate lung nodules detected in lung cancer screening. Methods: FDG PET/CT was performed to characterize 64 baseline lung nodules >10 mm and 36 incidence nodules detected on low-dose CT screening in asymptomatic current or former smokers (83 men, age range 40-83 years) at high risk for lung cancer. CT images were acquired without intravenous contrast. Nodules were analyzed by size, density, and metabolic activity and visual scored on a 5-point scale for FDG uptake. Nodules were classified as negative for malignancy when no FDG uptake was observed, or positive when focal uptake was observed in the visual analysis, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. Final diagnosis was based on histopathological evaluation or at least 24 months of follow-up. Results: A total of 100 nodules were included. The prevalence of lung cancer was 1%. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of visual analysis to detect malignancy were 84%, 95%, 91%, and 91%, respectively, with an accuracy of 91% (AUC 0.893). FDG PET/CT accurately detected 31 malignant tumors (diameters 9-42 mm, SUVmax range 0.6-14.2) and was falsely negative in 6 patients. With SUVmax thresholds for malignancy of 1.5, 2, and 2.5, specificity was 97% but sensitivity decreased to 65%, 49%, and 46% respectively, and accuracy decreased to 85%, 79%, and 78% respectively (AUC 0.872). Conclusions: The visual analysis of FDG PET/CT scan is highly accurate in characterizing indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Semi-quantitative analysis does not improve the accuracy of FDG PET/CT over that obtained with a qualitative method for lung nodule characterization. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]  
Allen-Auerbach M, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P298
[3]   Combined use of positron emission tomography and volume doubling time in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning [J].
Ashraf, H. ;
Dirksen, A. ;
Loft, A. ;
Bertelsen, A. K. ;
Bach, K. S. ;
Hansen, H. ;
Pedersen, J. H. ;
Mortensen, J. .
THORAX, 2011, 66 (04) :315-319
[4]   Early lung cancer detection using spiral computed tomography and positron emission tomography [J].
Bastarrika, G ;
García-Velloso, MJ ;
Lozano, MD ;
Montes, U ;
Torre, W ;
Spiteri, N ;
Campo, A ;
Seijo, L ;
Alcaide, AB ;
Pueyo, J ;
Cano, D ;
Vivas, I ;
Cosín, O ;
Domínguez, P ;
Serra, P ;
Richter, JA ;
Montuenga, L ;
Zulueta, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 171 (12) :1378-1383
[5]   Is 18F FDG PET-CT cost effective in lung cancer? [J].
Buscombe, John ;
O'Rourke, E. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2007, 7 (04) :471-476
[6]   European Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trials: Post NLST [J].
Field, John K. ;
van Klaveren, Rob ;
Pedersen, Jesper H. ;
Pastorino, Ugo ;
Paci, Eugino ;
Becker, Nikolauss ;
Infante, Maurizo ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (05) :280-286
[7]   Preoperative Staging of Lung Cancer with Combined PET-CT. [J].
Fischer, Barbara ;
Lassen, Ulrik ;
Mortensen, Jann ;
Larsen, Soren ;
Loft, Annika ;
Bertelsen, Anne ;
Ravn, Jesper ;
Clementsen, Paul ;
Hogholm, Asbjorn ;
Larsen, Klaus ;
Rasmussen, Torben ;
Keiding, Susanne ;
Dirksen, Asger ;
Gerke, Oke ;
Skov, Birgit ;
Steffensen, Ida ;
Hansen, Hanne ;
Vilmann, Peter ;
Jacobsen, Grete ;
Backer, Vibeke ;
Maltbaek, Niels ;
Pedersen, Jesper ;
Madsen, Henrik ;
Nielsen, Henrik ;
Hojgaard, Liselotte .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (01) :32-39
[8]   Evaluation of Individuals With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer? Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines [J].
Gould, Michael K. ;
Donington, Jessica ;
Lynch, William R. ;
Mazzone, Peter J. ;
Midthun, David E. ;
Naidich, David P. ;
Wiener, Renda Soylemez .
CHEST, 2013, 143 (05) :E93-E120
[9]   Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions - A meta-analysis [J].
Gould, MK ;
Maclean, CC ;
Kuschner, WG ;
Rydzak, CE ;
Owens, DK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (07) :914-924
[10]  
Hashimoto Y, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P426