Assessment of coastal zone sustainable development: A case study of Yantai, China

被引:31
作者
Yu, Liangju [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hou, Xiyong [1 ]
Gao, Meng [1 ]
Shi, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Yantai Inst Coastal Zone Res, Yantai 264003, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Sch, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sustainable development; Natural capital; GPI; GDP; GENUINE PROGRESS INDICATOR; RESILIENCE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.04.003
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The assessment of sustainable development is a challenging task as its measuring is rather complex without a mature framework. In this paper, as a case study, a coastal city of China-Yantai was assessed for sustainable development in the period from 1998 to 2007. We used a methodological framework based on 36 indicators and three composite indices from the dimensions of environment, economy and society subsystems. The assessment results indicated that Yantai was almost in the potentially unsustainable development or intermediate sustainable development, except in 1998 and in 2007. Accordingly, the progress of sustainable development was divided into two stages in the light of the relative changes of three subsystems. Some relevant issues, such as natural capital, GPI vs. GDP in sustainable development assessment were discussed. Finally, an uncertainty analysis was also given in the assessment. In conclusion, the sustainable development in Yantai had experienced a shift from environment-based to social-economic-based in the past 10 years. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1225
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Alves FL, 2007, J COASTAL RES, P72
  • [2] Anielski M., 1999, The Genuine Progress Indicator - 1998 Update Redefining Progress
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1993, Ecological Economics, DOI DOI 10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, ALP CONV SUST RUR DE
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1990, HUM DEV REP
  • [8] Critical natural capital revisited: Ecological resilience and sustainable development
    Brand, Fridolin
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) : 605 - 612
  • [9] Breton F., 2006, Report on the use of the ICZM indicators from the WG-ID. A contribution to the ICZM evaluation. Version 1."indicators and data" working group (WG-ID) of the European ICZM expert group, P1
  • [10] Brundtland, 1987, Our Common Future: The World Comission on Environment and Development