Optimization of signal-to-noise ratio in dc soundings

被引:3
作者
Stoll, JB [1 ]
Bahr, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Inst Geophys, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.1444838
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Geoelectric (dc) sounding methods are usually limited to electrode spacings smaller than 1 km, which restrict the depth of investigation to only several hundreds of meters. Greater depths of investigation require both a larger electrode spacing and motor-generator driven transmitters. In order to increase the depth of investigation into the middle crust, the distance between transmitter and receiver dipole must be increased up to 100 km as well. Instead of a Schlumberger electrode configuration, we use a dipole-dipole electrode arrangement, which avoids cable connections of several tens of kilometers. It takes less logistics in the field and requires less precautions to control the cable circuits. However, the electric field of a grounded dipole decays by the power of 3. Even if a strong current source with a power of 30 kW is employed, at distances beyond 10 km the amplitude of the transmitted de signal becomes considerably smaller than the naturally inductive held and cultural noise. Here, we present a technique which resolves the transmitted de signal at sites up to 60 km apart using an electric dipole source. The suggested technique removes the inductive part in the time series and, therefore, reduces the noise level. It requires applying the magnetotelluric technique before and/or after the geoelectrical sounding. Both the magnetic and electric variational fields are recorded during geoelectrical sounding. If the magnetotelluric transfer function is obtained at a site, then the natural inductive electric field can be predicted, which in turn is used to remove the inductive electrical part from the receiver dipole record.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1500
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Signal-to-Noise Ratio Optimization for Planar Multijunction Thermal Converters
    Amagai, Yasutaka
    Okawa, Kenjiro
    Sakamoto, Norihiko
    Kaneko, Nobu-Hisa
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2023, 72
  • [22] OPTIMIZATION OF DIRECTIVITY AND SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO OF AN ARBITRARY ANTENNA ARRAY
    LO, YT
    LEE, SW
    LEE, QH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS, 1966, 54 (08): : 1033 - &
  • [23] SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO OPTIMIZATION IN HYDROPHONE-PREAMPLIFIER SYSTEMS
    YOUNG, JW
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1976, 60 : S18 - S18
  • [24] MUTUAL COUPLING IN SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO OPTIMIZATION OF ANTENNA ARRAYS
    DELISLE, GY
    CUMMINS, JA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 1973, EM15 (02) : 38 - 44
  • [25] OPTIMIZATION OF SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO OF GYRATOR-C-FILTERS
    GOCKLER, H
    AEU-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS, 1975, 29 (06): : 275 - 284
  • [26] Estimation uncertainties in the optical signal-to-noise ratio network optimization
    Durand F.R.
    Lopes G.M.
    Spagolla A.
    Abrão T.
    Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications, 2016, 15 (01): : 1 - 17
  • [27] Optimization of signal-to-noise ratio for efficient microarray probe design
    Matveeva, Olga V.
    Nechipurenko, Yury D.
    Riabenko, Evgeniy
    Ragan, Chikako
    Nazipova, Nafisa N.
    Ogurtsov, Aleksey Y.
    Shabalina, Svetlana A.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 32 (17) : 552 - 558
  • [28] Alignment mark optimization for improving signal-to-noise ratio of wafer alignment signal
    Du, Juyou
    Dai, Fengzhao
    Wang, Xiangzhao
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2019, 58 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [29] OPTIMIZATION OF THE INPUT SIGNAL OF A LINEAR FILTER MAXIMIZING THE SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO.
    Polyak, B.I.
    Radio Engineering and Electronic Physics (English translation of Radiotekhnika i Elektronika), 1982, 27 (10): : 60 - 64
  • [30] Mixed-Bandwidth Acquisitions: Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Signal-to-Noise Efficiency
    Choli, Morwan
    Jakob, Peter M.
    Loeffler, Ralf B.
    Hillenbrand, Claudia M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 32 (04) : 997 - 1002