Principles of first trimester screening in the age of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: screening for chromosomal abnormalities

被引:42
|
作者
Kagan, Karl Oliver [1 ]
Sonek, Jiri [2 ,3 ]
Wagner, Philipp [1 ]
Hoopmann, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Calwerstr 7, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Fetal Med Fdn USA, Dayton, OH USA
[3] Wright State Univ, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
关键词
First trimester screening; Trisomy; 21; Nuchal translucency; cfDNA; FETAL NUCHAL-TRANSLUCENCY; CELL-FREE DNA; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; PLACENTAL GROWTH-FACTOR; MATERNAL AGE; TRISOMIES; 21; DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS; NORMAL KARYOTYPE; TURNER SYNDROME; MIXTURE MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-017-4459-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
First trimester risk assessment for chromosomal abnormalities plays a major role in the contemporary pregnancy care. It has evolved significantly since its introduction in the 1990s, when it essentially consisted of just the nuchal translucency measurement. Today, it involves the measurement of several biophysical and biochemical markers and it is often combined with a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a secondary test. A search of the Medline and Embase databases was done looking for articles about first trimester aneuploidy screening. We performed a detailed review of the literature to evaluate the screening tests currently available and their respective test performance. Combined screening for trisomy 21 based on maternal age, fetal NT, and the serum markers free beta-hCG and PAPP-A results in a detection rate of about 90% for a false positive of 3-5%. With the addition of further ultrasound markers, the false positive rate can be roughly halved. Screening based on cfDNA identifies about 99% of the affected fetuses for a false positive rate of 0.1%. However, there is a test failure rate of about 2%. The ideal combination between combined and cfDNA screening is still under discussion. Currently, a contingent screening policy seems most favorable where combined screening is offered for everyone and cfDNA analysis only for those with a borderline risk result after combined screening. Significant advances in screening for trisomy 21 have been made over the past 2 decades. Contemporary screening policies can detect for more than 95% of affected fetuses for false positive rate of less than 3%.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 651
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-invasive prenatal screening tests - update 2022
    Kypri, Elena
    Ioannides, Marios
    Achilleos, Achilleas
    Koumbaris, George
    Patsalis, Philippos
    Stumm, Markus
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 46 (04) : 311 - 320
  • [22] The value of combined detailed first-trimester ultrasound-biochemical analysis for screening fetal aneuploidy in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing
    Ye, Caixia
    Duan, Hongyan
    Liu, Mengyuan
    Liu, Jianqiang
    Xiang, Jingwen
    Yin, Yizhen
    Zhou, Qiong
    Yang, Dan
    Yan, Ruiling
    Li, Ruiman
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (02) : 843 - 853
  • [23] A study on non-invasive prenatal screening for the detection of aneuploidy
    Chen, Yao
    Yang, Fang
    Shang, Xuan
    Liu, Siping
    Li, Meng
    Zhong, Mei
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2022, 93 (09) : 716 - 720
  • [24] First-Trimester Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Advantages of an Instant Results Approach
    Norton, Mary E.
    CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 30 (03) : 565 - +
  • [25] A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First Trimester Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening for Fetal Trisomies in the United States
    Walker, Brandon S.
    Nelson, Richard E.
    Jackson, Brian R.
    Grenache, David G.
    Ashwood, Edward R.
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [26] Rare chromosomal abnormalities: Can they be identified using conventional first trimester combined screening methods?
    Kane, Daniel
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    Malone, Fergal D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2021, 10
  • [27] The significance of rare chromosomal abnormalities and fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis in the non-invasive prenatal testing era
    Zsolt, Tidrenczel
    Erika, P. Tardy
    Ildiko, Bojtos
    Edina, Sarkadi
    Judit, Simon
    Henriett, Piko
    Gabor, Vermes
    Janos, Demeter
    Artur, Beke
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2021, 162 (29) : 1156 - 1165
  • [28] Nanostructures in non-invasive prenatal genetic screening
    Sadeghi, Samira
    Rahaie, Mahdi
    Ostad-Hasanzadeh, Bita
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING LETTERS, 2022, 12 (01) : 3 - 18
  • [29] Non-invasive prenatal screening for Emanuel syndrome
    Luo, Yuqin
    Lin, Jie
    Sun, Yixi
    Qian, Yeqing
    Wang, Liya
    Chen, Min
    Dong, Minyue
    Jin, Fan
    MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [30] Clinical value of screening prenatal ultrasound combined with chromosomal microarrays in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities
    Jiang, Hongru
    Kong, Xiangtian
    Bian, Wenjun
    Liu, Jiangyue
    Xu, Yuanyuan
    Cui, Aimin
    Cao, Xian
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (01)